犯罪人员人格特征问卷的编制及相关研究

发布时间：2018-05-08 00:33

本文选题：犯罪人员 + 人格特征　；参考：《南京师范大学》2007年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本研究的目的是编制适合我国犯罪人员人格特征的“犯罪人员人格特征问卷”，并用此问卷对犯罪人员的人格特征进行初步研究。本研究在文献综述的基础上，编制犯罪人员人格特征问卷，验证其信度和效度。然后以200名非犯罪人员为控制组，用正式的“犯罪人员人格特征问卷”对南京市某监狱和江苏省某监狱的308名犯罪人员进行了调查，探讨了犯罪人员一般的人格特征，以及性别、年龄、犯罪类型、文化程度、婚姻状况等因素与犯罪人员人格特征的关系，以此进一步考察犯罪人员人格特征问卷的信度和效度。研究结果表明： 1．自编的“犯罪人员人格特征问卷”由自我控制、社会人际交往、责任心和价值观四个维度构成，此外还包括一个测谎问卷和一个心理健康问卷。具有较好的信度和效度。 2．犯罪人员在四个维度的得分及问卷总得分均低于非犯罪组，并有显著差异。犯罪人员更倾向于掩饰自己的真实情况，，人格障碍的程度也更为严重。 3．在性别因素上，犯罪人员的人格特征在责任心维度上存在性别差异，女性得分高于男性。在自我控制、社会人际交往、价值观和犯罪性的强弱上不存在显著差异。 4．虽然暴力型罪犯在自我控制维度的得分要低于财产型罪犯的得分，但没有达到显著差异。财产型罪犯与暴力型罪犯在犯罪性的强弱上不存在显著差异。 5．年龄与犯罪人员的自我控制、社会人际交往有显著的正相关关系，与说谎分数有显著负相关关系，与责任心、价值观没有显著的相关关系。 6．文化程度与犯罪人员的人格特征没有显著的相关关系。 7．婚姻状况与犯罪人员的人格状况有很大相关。已婚与未婚犯罪者在各维度及总分上的平均数差异都达到了显著性水平，已婚与离异犯罪者在一些维度及总分上的平均数差异也达到了显著性水平，而未婚犯罪者与离异犯罪者的得分差异不显著。 8．通过对以上犯罪人员人格特征的分析，与一些已有的研究结果较为一致，说明本问卷具有较好的效度。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this study is to compile the "Criminal Personality characteristics questionnaire", which is suitable for the personality characteristics of the criminals in China, and to use this questionnaire to study the personality characteristics of the criminals. On the basis of literature review, a questionnaire on personality characteristics of criminals was developed to verify its reliability and validity. Then, with 200 non-criminals as control group, 308 criminals in a prison in Nanjing and a prison in Jiangsu Province were investigated with the formal "Personality characteristics of criminals questionnaire", and the general personality characteristics of the criminals were discussed. And the relationship between sex, age, type of crime, education level, marital status and the personality characteristics of criminals, so as to further investigate the reliability and validity of the questionnaire of personality characteristics of criminals. The results show that: 1. The Personality characteristics questionnaire of criminals is composed of four dimensions: self-control, social interpersonal communication, responsibility and values. In addition, it also includes a polygraph questionnaire and a mental health questionnaire. It has good reliability and validity. 2. The scores of the criminal in the four dimensions and the total score of the questionnaire were lower than those of the non-criminal group, and there were significant differences. Criminals tend to hide their true situation, and personality disorders are more serious. 3. In terms of gender factors, there are gender differences in the personality characteristics of criminals in the dimension of responsibility, and the scores of women are higher than those of men. There is no significant difference in self-control, social interpersonal interaction, values and criminal strength. 4. Although the score of violent criminals in self-control dimension was lower than that of property criminals, there was no significant difference. There is no significant difference between property criminals and violent criminals. 5. Age has significant positive correlation with self-control, social interpersonal communication, negative correlation with lying score, and no significant correlation with responsibility and values. 6. There is no significant correlation between the level of education and the personality characteristics of criminals. 7. Marital status is closely related to the personality of the criminal. The differences of the average of married and unmarried offenders in each dimension and total score were significant, and the differences of married and divorced offenders in some dimensions and total scores were also significant. There was no significant difference in scores between unmarried offenders and divorced offenders. 8. Through the analysis of the personality characteristics of the above criminals, the results are consistent with some previous studies, which shows that this questionnaire has a good validity.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2007
【分类号】：B841.7;D917.2

【相似文献】