我国诉讼中鉴定结论质证问题研究

发布时间：2018-08-23 14:00

【摘要】： 本文的第一部分着力于对鉴定结论的相关理论问题进行明晰,在分析鉴定结论的证据属性的基础上得出,鉴定结论从诉讼的角度分析其本质是一种诉讼行为;从证据的角度是人的证据、言词证据;从鉴定对象的角度涉及的是诉讼中的专门性问题,所以其理应遵循诉讼程序的要求对其进行质证。循着司法鉴定与质证关系的进路,在本文的第二部分则努力寻找鉴定结论与质证之间的法理基础,从经济分析和法律论证的角度进行评析,结果是用程序的方法来解决程序的问题,用质证的方式来解决实践中的鉴定问题。第三部分主要是对当今世界其它国家的鉴定结论质证制度进行比较考察,在比较分析的基础上,找出其制度的合理性和内在规律,为我们的鉴定制度完善提供一个坐标。本文的第四部分是全文的核心,主要从制度构建上着手,程序上从庭前展示和交叉询问两个部分来进行完善,制度上完善证人出庭作证制度和设立专家辅助人参与质证规则。通过对这个几个问题的细致考察,试图以质证程序为突破口,在直接言辞原则、公开原则、当事人充分参与原则以及有效辩护原则为构建目标下的程序正义理论上,为我国当前鉴定结论运用中遇到的种种问题提供一种全新的解决途径
[Abstract]:The first part of this paper focuses on the identification of theoretical issues related to the clear conclusion in the analysis of the evidence of the conclusion on the basis of attribute, the conclusion from the point of view of litigation analysis of its nature is a litigation act; From the point of view of evidence is human evidence, verbal evidence; from the point of view of the object of identification is involved in the issue of specialization in litigation, so it should follow the requirements of the proceedings to cross-examine them. Following the path of the relationship between forensic identification and cross-examination, in the second part of this paper, we try to find the legal basis between the conclusion of identification and cross-examination, and analyze from the angle of economic analysis and legal argumentation. The result is to solve the problem of procedure by the method of procedure, and to solve the problem of identification in practice by means of cross-examination. The third part mainly makes a comparative investigation on the system of cross-examination of appraisal conclusion in other countries in the world. On the basis of comparative analysis, it finds out the rationality and inherent law of the system, and provides a coordinate for the perfection of our appraisal system. The fourth part of this paper is the core of the full text, mainly from the system construction, the procedure from the pre-court display and cross-examination to improve the two parts, the system of witnesses to testify in court and the establishment of expert assistant to participate in cross-examination rules. Through the careful investigation of these questions, this paper tries to take cross-examination procedure as the breakthrough point, in order to construct the procedural justice theory under the principle of direct speech, the principle of openness, the principle of full participation of the parties and the principle of effective defense. To provide a new way to solve the problems encountered in the application of the current appraisal conclusions in China.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D918.9

【相似文献】