当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 公安论文 >

劳动教养工作绩效考核机制研究

发布时间:2018-10-20 14:08
【摘要】: 劳动教养机关是指国家为保证准确、有效的执行劳动教养法律、法规,收容、管理和教育挽救劳动教养人员,完成劳动教养工作任务而依法设置的国家行政执法机关。劳动教养机关隶属于国务院、省(区、市)和市(地)司法行政部门,是依法设立、行使行政职权、履行行政职责的行政机关,其依法实施的具体行政行为具有法定的确定力、强制力和执行力。 劳动教养工作人民警察是依法履行劳动教养工作职责、纳入国家行政编制、由财政全额保证工资福利的国家公务员,其考核制度必须遵循相关法律法规的规定。同时,由于工作任务的特殊性,其考核又必须有自身的特点。 劳动教养工作历经50年发展,在绩效考核的工作实践中,在人事部门多年的努力下,已初步形成了具有本系统行业特点的绩效考核制度。但是随着社会文明进程的推进和国家法治建设的加快,随着近年来我国公务员制度的改革和新时期劳动教养工作职能、工作任务和工作特点的转化,对劳动教养工作绩效考核制度提出了更高的要求。只有不断深化对绩效考核考核制度的研究,认真思考现行制度的缺陷与不足,针对性地提出可操作的改革对策,并在实践中加以检验和调整,才能使劳动教养工作绩效考核制度日臻成熟和完善。 本文着眼于形势任务的快速发展对深化我国劳教系统绩效考核工作提出的更高要求,通过对现行劳动教养绩效考核制度的调研分析,详细阐述了目前劳动教养绩效考核制度存在的突出问题,并进一步剖析了产生这些问题的原因。在此基础上笔者提出了完善和发展劳动教养绩效考核制度的思路和对策,以期对劳动教养绩效考核工作实践起到积极作用。
[Abstract]:Reeducation-through-labor organs are the national administrative law enforcement agencies set up according to law to ensure the accurate and effective enforcement of the laws, regulations, reception, management and education of reeducation through labour personnel and to complete the task of reeducation through labor. The organs of re-education through labour are subordinate to the judicial administrative departments of the State Council, provinces (districts, municipalities) and municipalities (prefectures). They are administrative organs established according to law, exercising their administrative functions and powers, and performing their administrative duties. The specific administrative acts they carry out in accordance with the law have a statutory determination power. Enforcement and execution. The people's police of the reeducation through labor work is the national civil servant who performs the duty of reeducation through labor according to law, which is included in the national administrative system and guaranteed the salary and welfare by the full amount of finance, and its appraisal system must follow the provisions of the relevant laws and regulations. At the same time, due to the particularity of the task, its examination must have its own characteristics. After 50 years of development, in the practice of performance appraisal, under the efforts of the personnel department for many years, the performance appraisal system with the characteristics of this system has been formed. However, with the advancement of social civilization and the acceleration of the construction of the country's rule of law, with the reform of the civil service system in recent years and the transformation of the functions, tasks and characteristics of reeducation through labour in the new period, Put forward higher request to the performance appraisal system of reeducation through labor. Only by deepening the study of the performance appraisal system, seriously thinking about the defects and shortcomings of the current system, putting forward the operational reform countermeasures, and testing and adjusting in practice, Only in this way can the performance appraisal system of reeducation through labor become more mature and perfect. This paper focuses on the higher requirements of the rapid development of the task of the situation to deepen the performance appraisal of the re-education through labor system in China, through the investigation and analysis of the current performance appraisal system of re-education through labor. This paper expounds in detail the outstanding problems existing in the performance appraisal system of reeducation through labor at present, and further analyzes the causes of these problems. On this basis, the author puts forward the ideas and countermeasures of perfecting and developing the performance appraisal system of reeducation through labor, in order to play a positive role in the practice of performance appraisal of reeducation through labor.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:D926.8

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 王彦吉,余凌云;当前英国警务工作面临的挑战及其对策[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期

2 陈捷;绩效评估研究的新进展[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);1997年03期

3 林鸿潮;美国《政府绩效与结果法》述评[J];行政法学研究;2005年02期

4 贺卫方;中国司法管理制度的两个问题[J];中国社会科学;1997年06期

5 马克·霍哲(Marc Holzer),张梦中;公共部门业绩评估与改善[J];中国行政管理;2000年03期

6 张璋;政府绩效评估的元设计理论:两种模式及其批判[J];中国行政管理;2000年06期

7 窦泽秀,秦冬杰;我国公务员职位分类制度的重新设计探讨[J];中国行政管理;2001年03期

8 马宝成;试论政府绩效评估的价值取向[J];中国行政管理;2001年05期



本文编号:2283405

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/gongan/2283405.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户bd211***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com