情感性信任:国家间互信关系中的深度形式

发布时间：2018-04-24 22:39

本文选题：国家间互信 + 战略信任　；参考：《学海》2017年06期

【摘要】：当前,世界各国都开始重视国家间信任的问题。一般来说,国家间互信有三个主要维度:理性选择维度、情感心理维度和文化认同维度,其中的情感心理维度是其中一种深度模式。目前,各国主要强调的是"战略互信",也就是理性选择基础上的关于战略利益方面的互信。但是,国际政治中无政府状态下的战略利益维系的互信并不稳定,国家间更需要发展出一种更深程度的信任,即情感性信任。信任理论认为信任固然有利益的理性计算,也受到行为者情感状态和关系的影响。国际政治中主要理论虽然强调行为体的理性假设,也认为情感心理是一种主要的研究路径。信任理论和国际关系理论中的情感因素研究,构成了国家间情感性信任的理论基础。决策者和公众的情感状态都影响国家间情感性信任的形成与维持。中美缓和中双方情感增进的案例,有力地证明了情感性信任在国家关系中的作用。这种情感性信任会成为两国长期稳定、友好关系的基石,为当今的国际关系,尤其是中美关系提供了积极的示范。
[Abstract]:At present, all countries in the world have begun to attach importance to trust between countries. Generally speaking, there are three main dimensions of mutual trust between countries: rational choice dimension, emotional psychological dimension and cultural identity dimension, among which the emotional psychological dimension is one of the deep modes. Mutual trust in strategic interests. However, the mutual trust of the strategic interests under the state of anarchy in international politics is not stable, and the country needs to develop a deeper trust, that is, emotional trust. The theory of trust believes that trust is of course rational calculation of interest and the influence of the emotional state and relationship of the actor. Although the main theory of international politics emphasizes the rational hypothesis of the actor, the emotional psychology is a main research path. The study of emotional factors in the theory of trust and the theory of international relations constitutes the theoretical basis for the emotional trust between countries. The emotional state of the decision-makers and the public affects the formation of emotional trust among countries. The case of emotional enhancement between China and the United States is a strong proof of the role of emotional trust in national relations. This kind of emotional trust will be the cornerstone of long-term stability and friendly relations between the two countries, and provides a positive demonstration for today's international relations, especially the Sino US relations.

【作者单位】：南京大学历史学院;
【基金】：“海上丝绸之路的战略性项目实施策略研究”的成果之一
【分类号】：D815

【相似文献】