“生活本体论”的回归与重构

发布时间：2018-05-19 04:34

本文选题：本体论基础 + 国家重大战略　；参考：《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：党的十九大的最重要成果是确立了习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的指导地位,作出了新时代主要矛盾是"人民日益增长的美好生活需要和不平衡不充分的发展之间的矛盾"的论断和确定了创造人民美好生活的奋斗目标。学术研究要为国家重大战略服务。本刊围绕"创造美好生活的学理基础"发表一组文章。《为创造人民美好生活的伟大实践提供理论滋养》一文提出,当前学界的一项重大理论任务就是如何依据"生存、享受、发展"三个层次相统一的原则,科学阐释符合我国新时代的美好生活含义及建立相应指标体系;如何从生活的逻辑出发,以提升生活质量、促进人的全面发展为目标,实施超越经济范畴的"广义社会供给侧"结构改革;如何提升生活主体的素质和发挥"生活方式效益",实现美好生活社会建构和生活者自我建构的统一。《"生活本体论"的回归与重构》和《"生活本体论"建构的理论基石及其意义》两篇文章,分别从不同的理论视角对王雅林教授的专著《回家的路:重回生活的社会》作出了理论回应,前者把该书对基本理论和概念的创新概括为"四个为什么",指出作者基于文化自信,所建立的"生活本体论"社会概念解释框架是对西方社会学主客体"二分研究范式的超越,为我国实现以美好生活为目标的发展提供了重要概念基础,后者在梳理马克思及中外学术史的基础上指出该书从方法论上超越结构论和建构论,基于关系论的理论策略和整体论的学术立场,建构"生活本体论"社会范畴的科学合理性。最后一篇《创造美好生活应从寻找生活真相开始》一文指出,如何界定生活范畴是对社会学家智慧的挑战,强调了如何解释生活真相(生活事实)、从而把握美好生活生成规律的重要性。
[Abstract]:The most important achievement of the Party's 19th CPC National Congress is the establishment of the guiding position of the socialist thought with Chinese characteristics in the new era of Xi Jinping. The conclusion that the principal contradiction in the new era is "the contradiction between the growing needs of the people in a better life and the unbalanced and inadequate development" and the determination of the struggle goal for creating a better life for the people. Academic research should serve the country's major strategy. The journal published a series of articles around "the theoretical basis for creating a better Life." the article "providing theoretical nourishment for the great practice of creating a better life for the people" puts forward that one of the major theoretical tasks of the current academic community is how to live and enjoy according to "living and enjoying." The principle of the unity of the three levels of development, the scientific interpretation of the meaning of a better life in the new era of our country and the establishment of a corresponding index system, how to improve the quality of life and promote the overall development of human beings from the logic of life, Carrying out the structural reform of "broad social supply-side" beyond the scope of economy; How to improve the quality of the main body of life and give full play to the "way of life", and realize the unity between the construction of a better life society and the self-construction of the life body. "the return and Reconstruction of the Ontology of Life" and "the Theory of the Construction of the Ontology of Life" "Cornerstone and its significance." two articles, From different theoretical perspectives, the author makes a theoretical response to Professor Wang Yalin's monograph "the way home: a society back to life". The former generalizes the book's innovation of basic theories and concepts as "four Why", and points out that the framework of social concept interpretation of "ontology of life", which is based on cultural self-confidence, is a transcendence of the dichotomous research paradigm of "subject and object" in western sociology. It provides an important conceptual basis for the realization of the development of a better life in China. The latter, on the basis of combing Marx and the academic history of China and foreign countries, points out that the book transcends the theory of structure and constructivism in methodology. Based on the theoretical strategy of relation theory and the academic standpoint of holism, the scientific rationality of social category of "life ontology" is constructed. The final article, "creating a better Life should begin with the search for the Truth of Life", points out that how to define the scope of life is a challenge to sociologists' wisdom. It emphasizes the importance of how to explain the truth of life.
【作者单位】：南京市社会科学院;
【分类号】：D61

【相似文献】