当前我国协商民主实效性研究
发布时间：2018-07-21 13:12
【摘要】：从一定程度上来说,协商民主理论属于“舶来品”,因为它起源于西方。但是与以往西方政治不同的是,协商民主理论在中国民主政治的发展过程中,不仅起源早,并且应用广泛。早在半个世纪前,协商民主的价值就得到了中国共产党的关注,在系统的了解了协商民主的理论的同时,在实践层面上创建了以人民政协为主要形式,多种协商形式共同发展的协商民主制度。无论在价值诉求或是操作程序上,将协商民主的优势尽显无疑,在协商民主的具体应用中,中国特色协商民主包涵的领域更加广阔：不仅包涵制度层面的协商民主,如人民代表大会制度中的协商民主、政治协商会议；而且包涵非制度层面的协商民主形式,如民主恳谈会、村(居)民议事会、网络政务论坛等。中国特色协商民主在实践中内容丰富,形式广泛,但也存在着缺陷。因为,简单来说,就是协商民主的合法性源于统治权力赋予。当今社会,统治者治理国家的权力与合法性是选举赋予的,但是这并不代表着选举就可以保证政权民主的合法性,或者增加决策的合法性。如何增加,当前我国而言,就是要将选举民主与协商民主相结合,在决策中体现协商,突出合法性。所以,当前协商民主在中国运用的最大局限就是,协商民主缺乏实效性。实效性既是协商民主的价值又是协商民主的前提,是协商民主的核心之义。增强协商民主实效性,有助于避免协商与决策的脱节,有助于保障协商质量,体现了协商民主的合法性。针对协商民主在我国实践的具体情况。增强协商民主实效性的途径,本文认为可以从制度、工作机制、形式与内容、民众的协商意识这些层面解决,健全协商民主制度的基础上完善协商民主工作机制,以拓展协商民主的渠道与形式,丰富协商民主内容。
[Abstract]:To some extent, the theory of deliberative democracy belongs to the "import", because it originated in the West. But different from the western politics in the past, the theory of deliberative democracy not only originated early, but also applied widely in the development of Chinese democratic politics. As early as half a century ago, the value of deliberative democracy received the attention of the Communist Party of China. While systematically understanding the theory of consultative democracy, it created the CPPCC as the main form at the practical level. A consultative democracy in which various forms of consultation develop together. In terms of value demands and operating procedures, the advantages of deliberative democracy are unquestionably evident. In the concrete application of deliberative democracy, the domain covered by deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics is even broader: not only the deliberative democracy at the institutional level, but also the deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics. For example, the consultative democracy and political consultative meetings in the system of people's congresses include non-institutional forms of deliberative democracy, such as democratic talks, village councils, online government forums, and so on. Consultative democracy with Chinese characteristics is rich in content and wide in form in practice, but it also has defects. For, to put it simply, the legitimacy of deliberative democracy stems from the empowerment of power. In today's society, the power and legitimacy of rulers to govern the country are conferred by elections, but this does not mean that elections can guarantee the legitimacy of political power democracy or increase the legitimacy of decision-making. How to increase, at present, is to combine electoral democracy with consultative democracy, to embody consultation in decision-making and to highlight legitimacy. Therefore, the biggest limitation of the current application of deliberative democracy in China is that it lacks effectiveness. Effectiveness is not only the value of deliberative democracy, but also the premise of deliberative democracy and the core meaning of deliberative democracy. Enhancing the effectiveness of negotiation democracy is helpful to avoid the disconnection between negotiation and decision-making, to guarantee the quality of negotiation, and to embody the legitimacy of consultative democracy. In view of the concrete situation of the practice of deliberative democracy in our country. This paper holds that we can solve the problem from the aspects of system, working mechanism, form and content, people's consciousness of consultation, and perfect the working mechanism of consultation democracy on the basis of perfecting the democratic system of consultation. In order to expand the channels and forms of deliberative democracy, enrich the content of deliberative democracy.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D621
本文编号：2135637
[Abstract]:To some extent, the theory of deliberative democracy belongs to the "import", because it originated in the West. But different from the western politics in the past, the theory of deliberative democracy not only originated early, but also applied widely in the development of Chinese democratic politics. As early as half a century ago, the value of deliberative democracy received the attention of the Communist Party of China. While systematically understanding the theory of consultative democracy, it created the CPPCC as the main form at the practical level. A consultative democracy in which various forms of consultation develop together. In terms of value demands and operating procedures, the advantages of deliberative democracy are unquestionably evident. In the concrete application of deliberative democracy, the domain covered by deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics is even broader: not only the deliberative democracy at the institutional level, but also the deliberative democracy with Chinese characteristics. For example, the consultative democracy and political consultative meetings in the system of people's congresses include non-institutional forms of deliberative democracy, such as democratic talks, village councils, online government forums, and so on. Consultative democracy with Chinese characteristics is rich in content and wide in form in practice, but it also has defects. For, to put it simply, the legitimacy of deliberative democracy stems from the empowerment of power. In today's society, the power and legitimacy of rulers to govern the country are conferred by elections, but this does not mean that elections can guarantee the legitimacy of political power democracy or increase the legitimacy of decision-making. How to increase, at present, is to combine electoral democracy with consultative democracy, to embody consultation in decision-making and to highlight legitimacy. Therefore, the biggest limitation of the current application of deliberative democracy in China is that it lacks effectiveness. Effectiveness is not only the value of deliberative democracy, but also the premise of deliberative democracy and the core meaning of deliberative democracy. Enhancing the effectiveness of negotiation democracy is helpful to avoid the disconnection between negotiation and decision-making, to guarantee the quality of negotiation, and to embody the legitimacy of consultative democracy. In view of the concrete situation of the practice of deliberative democracy in our country. This paper holds that we can solve the problem from the aspects of system, working mechanism, form and content, people's consciousness of consultation, and perfect the working mechanism of consultation democracy on the basis of perfecting the democratic system of consultation. In order to expand the channels and forms of deliberative democracy, enrich the content of deliberative democracy.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D621
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 孙津;;协商民主创制的主要问题和难点[J];中国政协理论研究;2013年02期
2 陈惠丰;;“健全社会主义协商民主制度”的意义和主要任务[J];中国政协理论研究;2013年01期
3 黄国华;;社会主义协商民主新概括的若干思考[J];中国政协理论研究;2013年01期
4 张立群;;关于推进社会主义协商民主制度的思考[J];青海社会科学;2013年01期
5 包心鉴;;论协商民主的现实政治价值和制度化构建[J];中共天津市委党校学报;2013年01期
6 李红梅;;试析人民政协发展协商民主的创新空间[J];中国政协理论研究;2012年04期
，本文编号：2135637
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2135637.html
