中国国际话语权问题研究
发布时间：2018-09-10 07:15
【摘要】：近年来,世界各国对国际话语权的争夺日益激烈,中国也深陷国际话语权的“大博弈”之中。明确中国国际话语权存在的问题,落实提升中国国际话语权的对策建议成为中国亟待解决的问题。国际话语权是指国际行为体以话语为载体,通过各种渠道提出并阐释自身观念,并使其他国际行为体接受、认同并影响其行为选择的能力。话语传播者、话语对象、话语平台、话语内容和话语反馈是国际话语权的五个基本要素。五个基本要素间的互联互动,构成国际话语权的形成机制。根据话语反馈与话语内容预期目标之间的不同情况,可以对国际话语权是否形成及强弱进行判断。非孤立性、利益指向性、系统性与被动性是国际话语权的基本属性。中国国际话语权的发展历程分为三个阶段:(1)新中国成立-恢复联合国合法席位:新生发展;(2)1978年改革开放后-2008年:滑落偏弱;(3)2008年金融危机爆发-至今:喜忧参半。中国国际话语权在时间、内容与空间维度上都显露出问题。从时间维度来看,中国国家实力与中国国际话语权“错位”;从内容维度来看,中国国际话语权在世界经济、政治安全、社会文化等不同领域的差异明显;从空间维度来看,不同国家对中国国际话语权的认知各异,发展中国家好于发达国家,与中国关系紧张的周边国家要差于与中国关系良好的国家。多重因素造成了中国国际话语权在时间、内容、空间维度上存在的问题:(1)国际体系的制约;(2)话语内容利益契合度的影响;(3)“排他性”国际话语权的干扰。为进一步提升中国国际话语权,本文提出了四条对策建议:第一,国家角色定位多元化,积极改善话语对象对中国国家形象的认知;第二,积极寻求与世界各国的联合“发声”,扩大中国国际话语权的影响力;第三,倡导“合作共赢”理念,谋求利益契合度最大化;第四,提倡话语平台多样化。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the competition for the right of international discourse has become increasingly fierce in the world, and China is also deeply involved in the "big game" of the right of international discourse. The five basic elements of the international discourse right are the communicator, the object, the platform, the content and the feedback of the discourse. According to the different situations between the discourse feedback and the expected goal of the discourse content, we can judge whether the international discourse power is formed or not. Non-isolation, interest orientation, systematicness and passivity are the basic attributes of the international discourse power. China's legitimate seats: new development; (2) 1978 reform and opening up - 2008: weak decline; (3) 2008 financial crisis - so far: mixed joys and sorrows. From the space dimension, different countries have different perceptions of China's international discourse power, developing countries are better than developed countries, and neighboring countries with tense relations with China are worse than those with good relations with China. In order to further enhance China's international discourse power, this paper puts forward four suggestions: first, the diversification of national role orientation and positive improvement. Second, actively seek the joint "voice" with other countries to expand the influence of China's international discourse power; third, advocate the concept of "win-win cooperation" to maximize the degree of interest fit; fourth, advocate the diversification of discourse platform.
【学位授予单位】：国际关系学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D822
本文编号：2233760
[Abstract]:In recent years, the competition for the right of international discourse has become increasingly fierce in the world, and China is also deeply involved in the "big game" of the right of international discourse. The five basic elements of the international discourse right are the communicator, the object, the platform, the content and the feedback of the discourse. According to the different situations between the discourse feedback and the expected goal of the discourse content, we can judge whether the international discourse power is formed or not. Non-isolation, interest orientation, systematicness and passivity are the basic attributes of the international discourse power. China's legitimate seats: new development; (2) 1978 reform and opening up - 2008: weak decline; (3) 2008 financial crisis - so far: mixed joys and sorrows. From the space dimension, different countries have different perceptions of China's international discourse power, developing countries are better than developed countries, and neighboring countries with tense relations with China are worse than those with good relations with China. In order to further enhance China's international discourse power, this paper puts forward four suggestions: first, the diversification of national role orientation and positive improvement. Second, actively seek the joint "voice" with other countries to expand the influence of China's international discourse power; third, advocate the concept of "win-win cooperation" to maximize the degree of interest fit; fourth, advocate the diversification of discourse platform.
【学位授予单位】：国际关系学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D822
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 梁凯音;;论国际话语权与中国拓展国际话语权的新思路[J];当代世界与社会主义;2009年03期
2 张铭清;;话语权刍议[J];中国广播电视学刊;2009年02期
3 梁凯音;;论中国拓展国际话语权的新思路[J];国际论坛;2009年03期
4 李亚平;;周恩来在日内瓦会议上的外交艺术[J];党史纵览;2010年06期
5 徐进;;政治操作、理念贡献能力与国际话语权[J];绿叶;2009年05期
6 吴一敏;解读西方发达国家的话语霸权[J];南京政治学院学报;2005年03期
7 李超;;帕森斯社会行动理论探索研究[J];中国商界(上半月);2010年07期
8 檀有志;;国际话语权竞争:中国公共外交的顶层设计[J];教学与研究;2013年04期
9 辛斌;;福柯的权力论与批评性语篇分析[J];外语学刊;2006年02期
10 李少军;论国家利益[J];世界经济与政治;2003年01期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 王敏;中国崛起视角下的权力变迁与东亚安全架构[D];山东大学;2012年
2 韦进深;决策偏好与国家的国际制度行为研究[D];上海外国语大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 宋学良;论世界银行投票权改革及中国的参与[D];外交学院;2012年
，本文编号：2233760
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2233760.html
