邓小平“一国两制”理论与实践的创新研究
发布时间：2018-10-30 20:56
【摘要】：从马克思的社会矛盾论到邓小平的社会发展论是马克思主义社会历史观的跃迁,具有重要的实践和历史意义。中国改革开放总设计师是邓小平,他创造的一系列理论和制定的一些基本政策,无论是在过去、现在或是将来很长一段时间都将对中国的改革开放和繁荣稳定发展产生重大而深远的影响。 2014年是邓小平诞辰110周年,“一国两制”是他极具代表性的创设性构想。与祖国分离了一个半世纪的香港、澳门的顺利回归,也正是按照邓小平“一国两制”理论的创设性构想顺利完成的。但是在港、澳的具体实践过程中,出现了一些误解、质疑和反对的声音,有必要对其理论的目的、创新的方法论进行反思和总结,对质疑和反对作出澄清和反驳；国家的统一问题还没有最终解决,“一国两制”能否最终解决台湾问题,仍然是值得思考的。 邓小平实现“一国两制”理论的创新包含哪些方面的内容?这需要根据马克思主义中国化后得出的理论来进行总结。在香港成功回归17年之后,如何实现保持“一国两制”50年不变的长治久安,这需要研究香港多年来的发展问题和诸多关于香港发展的建议才能获得一些有益启示；针对台湾问题的复杂性,“一国两制”理论本身需要怎样的完善与进步,才能为完成祖国统一大业提供理论基础和现实依据?这些都是本论文研究探讨的问题。 本论文集中以“一国两制”在香港的成功实践为研究对象,兼及台湾问题作出思考。绪论部分介绍了本论文研究问题的提出及意义,概述了论题的国内外研究现状。第一章是关于邓小平“一国两制”理论的现实创新,概述了“一国两制”理论的现实基础、科学内涵及特别行政区的建立；第二章着重介绍“一国两制”理论本身、评价和现实意义；第三章是“一国两制”理论关于香港问题的解决、实践得出的观点和结论：由统一问题(香港回归)转向发展(香港发展)问题,由政治上的常规(一国一制即英国治下的资本主义)转向特殊(一国两制,社会主义中国治下的资本主义,享有高度自治权的特别行政区),由经济地位的特别化(大陆改革开放的窗口、国际贸易、引进资金和技术等的窗口)转向常规化(参与市场经济竞争的一个普通区域,与上海、深圳、广州等无差别),由利益诉求的特殊化(统一前的政治、经济、区域优势所形成)转向一般化(特别行政区不能具有超越宪法、基本法的政治上、经济上的诉求)等；第四章对“一国两制”理论根据我国实际情况对台湾的回归做一些再创新的探讨,认为“一国两制”关于台湾问题要遵循由发展促统一的战略,台湾问题统一仍是首要的问题,必须通过发展两岸关系(例如三通、政治对话等)来促进统一问题的解决。结语部分总结“一国两制”理论伟大创新及对解决台湾问题的重要意义。
[Abstract]:From Marx's theory of social contradiction to Deng Xiaoping's theory of social development is the transition of Marxist view of social history, which has important practical and historical significance. The chief architect of China's reform and opening up is Deng Xiaoping. He created a series of theories and formulated some basic policies, whether in the past, Now or for a long time in the future, China's reform and opening up, prosperity and stability will have a significant and far-reaching impact. The year 2014 marks the 110 th anniversary of Deng Xiaoping's birth, and one country, two systems, is his most representative creative idea. The smooth return of Hong Kong and Macao, which has been separated from the motherland for a century and a half, was also successfully completed according to Deng Xiaoping's founding conception of "one country, two systems". However, in the concrete practice of Hong Kong and Macao, there are some misunderstandings, doubts and objections. It is necessary to reflect on and summarize the purpose and innovative methodology of the theory, and to clarify and refute the doubt and opposition. The issue of national reunification has not yet been finally resolved, and it is still worth considering whether or not the "one country, two systems" issue can finally resolve the Taiwan issue. What are the contents of Deng Xiaoping's innovation in realizing the theory of "one country, two systems"? This needs to be summed up according to the theory of Marxism in China. 17 years after the successful return of Hong Kong to China, how to realize the long-term stability of "one country, two systems" for 50 years, it is necessary to study the development of Hong Kong for many years and many suggestions on the development of Hong Kong can get some useful enlightenment. In view of the complexity of the Taiwan issue, how does the theory of "one country, two systems" itself need to be perfected and improved in order to provide a theoretical and practical basis for accomplishing the great cause of the reunification of the motherland? These are the problems discussed in this paper. This thesis focuses on the successful practice of "one country, two systems" in Hong Kong and the Taiwan issue. The introduction introduces the research issues and significance of this paper, summarizes the current research situation at home and abroad. The first chapter is about the realistic innovation of Deng Xiaoping's theory of "one country, two systems", summarizes the realistic foundation, the scientific connotation and the establishment of the special administrative region of the "one country, two systems" theory. The second chapter focuses on the "one country, two systems" theory itself, evaluation and practical significance; The third chapter is the theory of "one country, two systems" on the solution of the Hong Kong problem, the views and conclusions drawn from practice: from the unification issue (Hong Kong's return) to the development (Hong Kong development) problem. From political convention (one country, one system, or British capitalism) to special (one country, two systems, socialist Chinese capitalism, special administrative regions with a high degree of autonomy), From the special economic status (the window of the mainland's reform and opening up, the window of international trade, the introduction of capital and technology, etc.) to the regularization (an ordinary area participating in the competition of the market economy, which is no different from Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc.), From the specialization of interest demand (formed by political, economic and regional advantages before unification) to generalization (special administrative region cannot have political and economic demands beyond constitution, basic law, etc.); The fourth chapter discusses the "one country, two systems" theory on the return of Taiwan according to the actual situation of our country, and holds that "one country, two systems" should follow the strategy of promoting reunification by development and the reunification of the Taiwan issue is still the primary issue. The issue of reunification must be resolved through the development of cross-strait relations (e. G. Three links, political dialogue, etc.). The conclusion summarizes the great innovation of the theory of "one country, two systems" and its significance in resolving the Taiwan issue.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D618
本文编号：2301160
[Abstract]:From Marx's theory of social contradiction to Deng Xiaoping's theory of social development is the transition of Marxist view of social history, which has important practical and historical significance. The chief architect of China's reform and opening up is Deng Xiaoping. He created a series of theories and formulated some basic policies, whether in the past, Now or for a long time in the future, China's reform and opening up, prosperity and stability will have a significant and far-reaching impact. The year 2014 marks the 110 th anniversary of Deng Xiaoping's birth, and one country, two systems, is his most representative creative idea. The smooth return of Hong Kong and Macao, which has been separated from the motherland for a century and a half, was also successfully completed according to Deng Xiaoping's founding conception of "one country, two systems". However, in the concrete practice of Hong Kong and Macao, there are some misunderstandings, doubts and objections. It is necessary to reflect on and summarize the purpose and innovative methodology of the theory, and to clarify and refute the doubt and opposition. The issue of national reunification has not yet been finally resolved, and it is still worth considering whether or not the "one country, two systems" issue can finally resolve the Taiwan issue. What are the contents of Deng Xiaoping's innovation in realizing the theory of "one country, two systems"? This needs to be summed up according to the theory of Marxism in China. 17 years after the successful return of Hong Kong to China, how to realize the long-term stability of "one country, two systems" for 50 years, it is necessary to study the development of Hong Kong for many years and many suggestions on the development of Hong Kong can get some useful enlightenment. In view of the complexity of the Taiwan issue, how does the theory of "one country, two systems" itself need to be perfected and improved in order to provide a theoretical and practical basis for accomplishing the great cause of the reunification of the motherland? These are the problems discussed in this paper. This thesis focuses on the successful practice of "one country, two systems" in Hong Kong and the Taiwan issue. The introduction introduces the research issues and significance of this paper, summarizes the current research situation at home and abroad. The first chapter is about the realistic innovation of Deng Xiaoping's theory of "one country, two systems", summarizes the realistic foundation, the scientific connotation and the establishment of the special administrative region of the "one country, two systems" theory. The second chapter focuses on the "one country, two systems" theory itself, evaluation and practical significance; The third chapter is the theory of "one country, two systems" on the solution of the Hong Kong problem, the views and conclusions drawn from practice: from the unification issue (Hong Kong's return) to the development (Hong Kong development) problem. From political convention (one country, one system, or British capitalism) to special (one country, two systems, socialist Chinese capitalism, special administrative regions with a high degree of autonomy), From the special economic status (the window of the mainland's reform and opening up, the window of international trade, the introduction of capital and technology, etc.) to the regularization (an ordinary area participating in the competition of the market economy, which is no different from Shanghai, Shenzhen, Guangzhou, etc.), From the specialization of interest demand (formed by political, economic and regional advantages before unification) to generalization (special administrative region cannot have political and economic demands beyond constitution, basic law, etc.); The fourth chapter discusses the "one country, two systems" theory on the return of Taiwan according to the actual situation of our country, and holds that "one country, two systems" should follow the strategy of promoting reunification by development and the reunification of the Taiwan issue is still the primary issue. The issue of reunification must be resolved through the development of cross-strait relations (e. G. Three links, political dialogue, etc.). The conclusion summarizes the great innovation of the theory of "one country, two systems" and its significance in resolving the Taiwan issue.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D618
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李德才,曹威麟;关于创新与哲学关系问题的思考[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年04期
2 曹均学;黄元全;;邓小平理论的创新精神及其源泉[J];重庆社会科学;2010年09期
3 李朝阳,王璇;试论邓小平创新的方法论特征[J];桂海论丛;2002年02期
4 周乐陶;;邓小平理论实践规律探究[J];淮海工学院学报(人文社会科学版);2012年01期
5 汪浩;关于创新规律性的探索[J];江西社会科学;2002年01期
6 徐静,袁玲红;论马克思主义中国化的当代方法论意义[J];江西社会科学;2003年10期
7 张建农;;再议“一国两制”[J];科技信息;2011年13期
8 霍甫安,毕凯鸣;关于创新的理论思考[J];理论探索;2004年02期
9 杨苏;;邓小平发展社会主义理论的方法论创新——试论邓小平对马克思主义中国化的特殊贡献[J];理论探讨;2007年01期
10 钟德涛;论“一国两制”科学构想的理论创新[J];理论月刊;2002年02期
，本文编号：2301160
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/guojiguanxi/2301160.html
