欧阳修《尹师鲁墓志》引发质疑的逻辑与史实

发布时间：2018-06-23 22:03

本文选题：欧阳修 + 尹洙墓志　；参考：《文史哲》2017年01期

【摘要】：墓铭文字既要面对"朋友门生故吏与孝子用心常异"的情感寄托,更需坚守"所纪事皆录实有稽据"的信史原则,其撰述过程往往牵涉到经学、史学与"古文"创作关联互动的深层逻辑。欧阳修所撰《尹师鲁墓志铭》所引发的争议,既隐约反映出欧、尹等人"以同而异"的史学取向,更集中体现着欧阳修"意主文章"而"于情事或不能详备"的著史风格。《墓志铭》文在称述尹洙"倡道"功绩方面颇有"所惜",盖与尹、欧之间的学术分歧密切相关。尹氏着意效法《春秋》之"微言大义",并倡言国家应"以明经为上第",其经学理念与欧阳修、孙复、石介等人"弃传从经"、"以己意言经"者背道而驰。至于师鲁文章"简而有法"的评述,既是欧阳修"每夸政事,不夸文章"的惯常做法,更隐约透露出此公不肯就"古文"一事少让于尹洙的微妙心态,其深刻复杂的人格动因及精神内涵值得深究。
[Abstract]:The inscription of tomb inscriptions should not only face the emotional sustenance of "friends, students, deceased officials and filial sons with different intentions", but also adhere to the principle of "all chronicles are recorded and documented." the process of compiling the inscriptions often involves the study of the classics. The deep logic of the interaction between historiography and the creation of ancient prose. The controversy caused by Ouyang Xiu's "Yin Shilu epitaph" is a vague reflection of the historical orientation of Europe, Yin and others, which are "identical but different". The epitaph reflects the historical style of Ouyang Xiu's "meaning main article" but "in the event or can't be prepared in detail". The epitaph has a "treasure" in describing Yin Su's achievements in "advocating the Tao", which is closely related to the academic differences between Yin and Europe. Yin emulated the "great meaning" of the Spring and Autumn period, and advocated that the state should "take the Ming Classic as the first place", and its philosophy of Confucian classics ran counter to those of Ouyang Xiu, Sun Fu, Shi Jiaoke and others who "forsaken and passed on the scriptures" and "said the scriptures with their own will". As for the commentary of Shi Lu's article "simple but with the method", it is not only the usual practice of Ouyang Xiu "to praise every political matter but not the article", but also a vague disclosure of the subtle mentality of Yu Yin-su 's refusal to let Yu Yin-soo be less willing to give up the "ancient prose" issue. Its profound and complicated personality motivation and spiritual connotation are worth studying deeply.
【作者单位】：杭州师范大学人文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学项目“宋代士人学术研究与诗文创作的关联与互动”(13YGA751064)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K877.45

【相似文献】