仰韶文化西来说的形成及论争——学术史视野下的考察
发布时间：2019-06-19 08:40
【摘要】：20世纪20年代,安特生提出了著名的仰韶文化西来假说。20世纪20年代,该说一度受到国际学术界的普遍关注。20世纪30年代前夕,无论是安特生或国际汉学家对仰韶文化西来说的倡导、附和,还是来自中国学术界的质疑与批判,并不带有明显的偏见。由于该阶段仰韶文化的发掘尚具有很大的局限性,20世纪30年代前夕国际学术界对仰韶文化和仰韶文化西来说的讨论总体上未有什么突破。20世纪30年代以后,学术界在对安特生仰韶文化六期说的讨论过程中,仰韶文化西来说日渐失去考古学方面的证据支持。迄20世纪40年代,随着齐家文化得到确认,仰韶文化西来说在学术界的普遍质疑与批判声中,不攻自破。自20世纪20年代一直延续到20世纪50年代初,中外学术界对安特生仰韶文化西来说的批判,从总体上看,属于学术范畴。20世纪50年代后中国大陆学者对安特生仰韶文化西来说的批判,一度受到政治因素的干扰,论争几无学术价值。自20世纪80年代以后,仰韶文化西来说方作为一个学术问题被学术界再次提出,在新的学术背景下,其在学术史上的价值始逐渐被学术界重新审视。
[Abstract]:In the 1920s, Anterson put forward the famous hypothesis that Yangshao culture came to the west. In the 1920s, the theory was paid more and more attention by the international academic circles. On the eve of the 1930s, whether Anterson or international Sinologists advocated the western Yangshao culture, echoed it, or questioned and criticized it from the Chinese academic circles, there was no obvious prejudice. Due to the great limitations of the excavation of Yangshao culture in this stage, there has been no breakthrough in the discussion of Yangshao culture and Yangshao culture in the international academic circles on the eve of 1930s. After 1930s, in the process of discussing the sixth phase of Antsen Yangshao culture, Yangshao culture in the west has lost archaeological evidence support day by day. By the 1940s, with the confirmation of Qijia culture, Yangshao culture in the west of the academic community in the widespread questioning and criticism, invincible. From the 1920s to the early 1950s, the criticism of Antsen Yangshao culture in Chinese and foreign academic circles belongs to the academic category on the whole. After 1950s, the criticism of Anterson Yangshao culture by mainland Chinese scholars was once interfered by political factors, and the argument has little academic value. Since the 1980s, Yangshao culture as an academic issue has been put forward again by the academic community, in the new academic background, its value in academic history has been gradually re-examined by the academic community.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学社会学院;
【基金】：2014年度国家社科基金一般项目(项目编号:14BZS078)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：K878
本文编号：2502225
[Abstract]:In the 1920s, Anterson put forward the famous hypothesis that Yangshao culture came to the west. In the 1920s, the theory was paid more and more attention by the international academic circles. On the eve of the 1930s, whether Anterson or international Sinologists advocated the western Yangshao culture, echoed it, or questioned and criticized it from the Chinese academic circles, there was no obvious prejudice. Due to the great limitations of the excavation of Yangshao culture in this stage, there has been no breakthrough in the discussion of Yangshao culture and Yangshao culture in the international academic circles on the eve of 1930s. After 1930s, in the process of discussing the sixth phase of Antsen Yangshao culture, Yangshao culture in the west has lost archaeological evidence support day by day. By the 1940s, with the confirmation of Qijia culture, Yangshao culture in the west of the academic community in the widespread questioning and criticism, invincible. From the 1920s to the early 1950s, the criticism of Antsen Yangshao culture in Chinese and foreign academic circles belongs to the academic category on the whole. After 1950s, the criticism of Anterson Yangshao culture by mainland Chinese scholars was once interfered by political factors, and the argument has little academic value. Since the 1980s, Yangshao culture as an academic issue has been put forward again by the academic community, in the new academic background, its value in academic history has been gradually re-examined by the academic community.
【作者单位】： 苏州大学社会学院;
【基金】：2014年度国家社科基金一般项目(项目编号:14BZS078)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：K878
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈星灿;;安特生与中国史前考古学的早期研究——为纪念仰韶文化发现七十周年而作[J];华夏考古;1991年04期
2 张静河;安特生在华北的考古活动[J];世界汉学;1998年01期
3 王文元;;安特生:被误解的开路者[J];丝绸之路;2010年17期
4 陈星灿;马思中;;胡适与安特生——兼谈胡适对20世纪前半叶中国考古学的看法[J];考古;2005年01期
5 ;f瘖U娭[J];考古通讯;1958年01期
6 李季;安特生与仰韶文化[J];百科知识;1999年03期
7 陈洪波;;安特生:中国现代考古学的开山人[J];大众考古;2013年01期
8 张华;;安特生对中国近代考古学的贡献[J];沧桑;2011年01期
9 陈星灿;;安特生与中国史前考古学的早期研究——为纪念仰韶文化发现七十周年而作[J];华夏考古;1992年01期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 张华;安特生的“沉浮”与中国考古学发展之路[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
2 刘润和;安特生与沙井文化[N];甘肃日报;2002年
3 本报记者 杨猛 实习记者 张冕;安特生归还中国宝真相[N];北京科技报;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 温丽骁;论安特生在近代中瑞考古学交流中的作用[D];兰州大学;2014年
2 王浩辉;论安特生在中国考古学史上的地位[D];兰州大学;2015年
，本文编号：2502225
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/kgx/2502225.html
