中国逻辑史视野下的先秦易学与名辩学

发布时间：2018-05-19 23:37

本文选题：易学逻辑 + 名辩逻辑　；参考：《周易研究》2006年02期

【摘要】：19世纪以来的中国逻辑史研究,比照西方逻辑,仅仅将先秦的名辩学看成是中国逻辑史的主要部分。其间虽有对《周易》的涉及,但也是浅尝辄止。本文从《周易》经、传产生的年代,特别是《周易》经、传所蕴涵的逻辑内容与先秦名辩逻辑的代表人物孔子、惠施、邓析等人的思想对比,说明先秦易学逻辑对名辩逻辑产生了深刻的影响。得出《周易》的经、传发轫了中国古代逻辑中的推类理论,而名辩学尤其是墨家辩学的推类理论则是对自《周易》以来的推类逻辑传统的总结和提高的结论。
[Abstract]:The study of Chinese logic history since the 19th century, compared with western logic, only regards the name dialectics of the pre-Qin Dynasty as the main part of the history of Chinese logic. Although there is a Zhouyi involved, but also a superficial taste. In this paper, the author compares the logical contents of the Zhouyi Sutra, especially the Zhouyi Sutra, with the thoughts of Confucius, Huishi and Deng Analytical, the representative figures of the logic of the pre-Qin Dynasty, such as Confucius, Hui Shi, Deng Analytical, and so on, from the time when the Book of changes came into being, especially the Book of changes. Explain the pre-Qin Yi study logic on the name of the logic has a profound impact. It comes to the conclusion that the classics of Zhouyi originated from the theory of push class in ancient Chinese logic, while the theory of nomenclature and dialectics, especially that of Mohist dialectics, is a summary and improvement of the tradition of pushing logic since the Book of changes.
【作者单位】：南开大学马克思主义教育学院
【分类号】：B221;B81-092

【相似文献】