当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 逻辑论文 >

博弈中的逻辑推理研究

发布时间:2018-06-08 17:17

  本文选题:博弈 + 逻辑方法 ; 参考:《燕山大学》2010年硕士论文


【摘要】:博弈是指个人或组织在一定的规则约束下,根据所处的环境,依据所掌握的信息,进行策略选择并加以实施,并从中取得相应收益的过程。文中主要探讨在策略选择的过程中,理性主体是如何推理来实现最大收益或支付值的。博弈中的逻辑推理正是逻辑思维、方法应用于博弈的尝试。理性人要做到使自己利益最大化,那么关键就在“推理”。关于博弈推理的研究,无论是对于逻辑学的应用还是博弈理论的发展都有一定的现实意义。 本文首先概述了博弈的定义、要素、分类及基本概念。并且从逻辑层面上探讨了博弈思维,同时也探讨了博弈思维应符合逻辑思维原则。在这一部分又通过分析博弈思维活动,对每个环节进行推理研究,从而更能体现逻辑性。在第二章中借助各种实例对博弈活动进行推理分析,从而分析博弈活动中的演绎推理和归纳推理,并探讨了这两种推理的关系。在第三章中,谈到博弈中存在的问题。这一部分首先对理性人假设困境进行分析,从而使理性基础地位得到加固。其次,对博弈中存在的悖论进行思考。逆推归纳法在逻辑上是严密的,可它却存在着“困境”。交流理性有助于消除逆推归纳法悖论。 逻辑学是一门应用科学,此文章的意义也在于扩展了逻辑学的研究范围,从而也丰富了博弈论。博弈逻辑仍处于初创阶段,需要进行更深层次的研究以推动理论的发展。理论研究成果也将运用到博弈活动中去指导实践。
[Abstract]:Game is a process in which individuals or organizations, under certain rules, choose and implement strategies according to their environment, according to the information they have, and make corresponding profits from them. In this paper, we mainly discuss how the rational agent can infer to realize the maximum income or payment value in the process of policy choice. The logic reasoning in the game is just the logical thinking, the method is applied to the attempt of the game. Rational people want to maximize their own interests, so the key lies in "reasoning." The study of game reasoning is of practical significance for the application of logic and the development of game theory. This paper first summarizes the definition, elements, classification and basic concepts of game theory. At the same time, it also discusses that the game thinking should conform to the principle of logical thinking. In this part, through the analysis of game thinking activities, the reasoning of each link is studied, so as to reflect the logic more. In the second chapter, we use various cases to analyze the reasoning of game activities, and then analyze the deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning in game activities, and discuss the relationship between the two kinds of reasoning. In the third chapter, we talk about the problems in the game. This part firstly analyzes the predicaments of rational man's hypothesis, so as to strengthen the rational foundation position. Secondly, the paradox in the game is considered. The inverse inductive method is strict in logic, but it has a "dilemma". Logic is an applied science. The significance of this paper is to expand the scope of logic and enrich game theory. Game logic is still in its infancy, and further research is needed to promote the development of the theory. Theoretical research results will also be applied to game activities to guide practice.
【学位授予单位】:燕山大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:B812

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 潘天群;;决策逻辑中的悖论研究[J];安徽大学学报;2006年05期

2 李健;;与归纳推理相关的两类博弈活动[J];毕节学院学报;2009年03期

3 张峰;;论博弈逻辑的分析方法——纳什均衡分析法[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年02期

4 贺寿南;尹秀娇;;博弈视野中逆向归纳法的逻辑分析[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2010年04期

5 张峰;博弈逻辑述评[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2004年03期

6 张峰;逆推归纳法悖论探析[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2004年12期

7 潘天群;从评价到决策:科学逻辑研究的可能转向[J];淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年03期

8 韩飞;;论决策过程中的逻辑应用[J];市场论坛;2010年03期

9 潘天群;博弈论中理性人假设的困境[J];经济学家;2003年04期

10 张峰;;博弈逻辑的发展轨迹探析[J];晋阳学刊;2008年01期



本文编号:1996579

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/1996579.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户869d6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com