逻辑学的形而上学渊源
发布时间：2018-09-16 19:09
【摘要】：在西方哲学史中,逻辑学的发展大致可归为两条脉络:一是亚里士多德—康德—费希特—黑格尔;二是亚里士多德—莱布尼茨—弗雷格—罗素。在第一条脉络中,传统逻辑、先验逻辑和思辨逻辑都试图去追溯其形而上学的渊源,但另一条脉络力图摒弃传统形而上学。本文着重阐述逻辑学从亚里士多德到黑格尔的这三种发展形态,旨在揭示这些形态是如何复归形而上学本性的;最后论及海德格尔对待这两条脉络的态度,阐述他如何从生存主义的角度独特地论证逻辑学的形而上学渊源,批判现代数理逻辑疏离和摒弃形而上学的趋势。
[Abstract]:In the history of western philosophy, the development of logic can be divided into two lines: Aristotle-Conde-Fichte-Hegel and Aristotle-Leibniz-Frege-Russell. In the first thread, the traditional logic, the transcendental logic and the speculative logic all try to trace the origin of their metaphysics, but the other tries to abandon the traditional metaphysics. This paper focuses on the three developmental forms of logic, from Aristotle to Hegel, in order to reveal how these forms return to metaphysical nature, and finally discusses Heidegger's attitude towards these two threads. This paper expounds how he demonstrates the metaphysical origin of logic from the perspective of existentialism, criticizes the trend of alienation and abandonment of metaphysics in modern mathematical logic.
【作者单位】： 上海财经大学哲学系;中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：B81-0
本文编号：2244507
[Abstract]:In the history of western philosophy, the development of logic can be divided into two lines: Aristotle-Conde-Fichte-Hegel and Aristotle-Leibniz-Frege-Russell. In the first thread, the traditional logic, the transcendental logic and the speculative logic all try to trace the origin of their metaphysics, but the other tries to abandon the traditional metaphysics. This paper focuses on the three developmental forms of logic, from Aristotle to Hegel, in order to reveal how these forms return to metaphysical nature, and finally discusses Heidegger's attitude towards these two threads. This paper expounds how he demonstrates the metaphysical origin of logic from the perspective of existentialism, criticizes the trend of alienation and abandonment of metaphysics in modern mathematical logic.
【作者单位】： 上海财经大学哲学系;中国人民大学法学院;
【分类号】：B81-0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孔易人;解决四个技术问题,实现传统逻辑教材的现代化[J];湖州师范学院学报;2005年04期
2 刘向;;浅析传统逻辑向现代逻辑发展的主要因素[J];西南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期
3 孙培福;传统逻辑功用再思考[J];理论学刊;1999年05期
4 童宝华;也谈传统逻辑的改革途径[J];湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版);1999年04期
5 李小虎;关于传统逻辑的公理[J];山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2000年04期
6 张文祥;从内涵逻辑的观点看传统逻辑的若干缺陷[J];公安学刊(浙江公安高等专科学校学报);2001年02期
7 滕定明;传统逻辑教科书必须拒斥“集合概念”[J];江西教育学院学报(社会科学);2001年01期
8 马佩;从传统逻辑的现代化谈起[J];郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年01期
9 董志铁;命运多舛 生机依然——传统逻辑1在中国[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2003年03期
10 贾改琴,刘卫花,蒋萍;传统逻辑教科书中的“概念”与“词项”之取舍[J];贵阳师范高等专科学校学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
，本文编号：2244507
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/ljx/2244507.html
