试论因明的论式

发布时间：2018-10-29 16:19

【摘要】：论文系统介绍和研究了因明的各个论式，并将新因明的核心问题——三支论式与古代中国的三物逻辑进行了比较研究：首先，因明的各个论式都有自己的特点。十支论式含有更多的论辩方面的东西，实用性比较强。五支论式虽有重复的成分存在，但已内含演绎的因素，为后来陈那的三支论式做了必要的理论准备。新因明的论式主要是陈那的三支论式，再就是法称修订的二支论式。因为三支论式是新因明的核心，所以论文对三支论式进行了重点分析。论文着重对三支论式诸种说法进行了分析探讨，指出了各说的不合理之处，并试图找到能够表达三支论式的正确形式。包括形式蕴涵的肯定式及否定式；全称量词销去之后充分条件假言推理的肯定前件式及否定后件式。法称的二支论式将喻归于因中，逻辑性更强。其次，因明论式从十支简化为五支，这一变化有一定原因。论文对此进行了分析探讨，指出这与它所依存的社会背景息息相关。另外，针对陈那改五支为三支和法称改三支为二支的情况，，论文作了详细的分析，并指出在这一过程中论式的非演绎性因素逐渐减少，演绎性因素逐渐增多。最后，将三支论式与三物逻辑进行了比较研究，分析了比较研究的意义，并指出二者的异同。得出了以下结论：三支论式虽然不如亚氏三段论格式复杂多样，但比三物逻辑的格式要丰富的多，形式化程度要高于三物逻辑。
[Abstract]:This paper systematically introduces and studies each theory of Inmin, and makes a comparative study of the core problem of New Inmin, the three-branch theory, and the three-substance logic of ancient China: first, each of InMing's theoretical forms has its own characteristics. Ten-branch theory contains more argumentative aspects of things, more practical. Although there are repeated elements in the five-branch theory, it contains deductive factors, which makes necessary theoretical preparation for Chen Na's three-branch theory. Xinyin-Ming's theory is mainly three-branch theory of Chen Na, and the two-branch theory of law-called revision. Because the three-branch theory is the core of the new cause-Ming, this paper focuses on the three-branch theory. This paper focuses on the analysis and discussion of the three branches theory, points out the irrationality of each theory, and tries to find the correct form which can express the three branches theory. It includes the positive and negative forms of formal implication and the positive and negative forms of positive and negative hypothetical reasoning after the elimination of full quantifiers. It is more logical for the two branches of the French term to attribute metaphor to the cause. Secondly, the formula of Indemnity is simplified from ten to five, and there are some reasons for this change. This paper analyzes and discusses this and points out that it is closely related to the social background on which it depends. In addition, in view of the situation that Chen Na changed five branches into three branches and France changed three branches into two branches, the paper makes a detailed analysis, and points out that in this process, the non-deductive factors of the theoretical form gradually decrease, and the deductive factors gradually increase. In the end, the author makes a comparative study of the three-branch theory and the three-substance logic, analyzes the significance of the comparative study, and points out the similarities and differences between the two. The following conclusions are drawn: although the three-branch theory is not as complex as the Asiatic syllogism, it is much richer than the three-object logic, and its formalization degree is higher than that of the three-object logic.
【学位授予单位】：燕山大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：B81-093.51

【参考文献】