评张一兵对“广松物象化论”的批评——日本学者对《回到马克思》的回应

发布时间：2018-03-20 04:25

本文选题：《回到马克思》　切入点：物象化或事物化　出处：《江苏社会科学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：张一兵教授的《回到马克思》日文版出版之后,在日本学界引发了广泛的关注。该著作对教条主义马克思主义的批判、对文本的关注以及国际马克思主义研究成果的运用,与以广松涉为代表的"日本新马克思主义"研究有共通之处。但是该书第三版中对广松涉物象化论的批评却有失偏颇。聚焦"Sache"(物象或事物)和"Ding"(物)"Versachlichung"(物象化或事物化)和"Verdinglichung"(物化),以及"Schein"(假象或现象)等概念的梳理和分析,我们可以发现:张一兵对广松涉的批评实质上是补充性的,或者说二者在出发点和理论旨趣上是相通的。但在具体的讨论中,张一兵忽略了广松涉阐释马克思历史唯物主义时所依据的现象学和现代物理学理论背景。
[Abstract]:After the publication of the Japanese edition of Professor Zhang Yibing's return to Marx, it has aroused widespread concern in Japanese academicians. The work criticizes dogmatic Marxism, pays close attention to the text, and applies the results of international Marxist research. There are some similarities with the study of "Japanese neo-Marxism", represented by Hiroshima. However, the third edition of the book is biased against the theory of materialization. Focus on "Sache" (object or thing) and "Ding" "Versachlichung" (materialization or event). Sorting out and analyzing the concepts of materialization and Verdinglichung, as well as Schein. We can find that Zhang Yi-bing 's criticism of Guangzongxue is complementary in nature, or that the two are similar in terms of starting point and theoretical purport. But in the specific discussion, Zhang Yiping ignored the phenomenological and modern physics background on which Guangsong was based in his interpretation of Marx's historical materialism.
【作者单位】：日本东京成德大学;日本东京成德大学人文学部;南京大学外国语学院日语系;
【分类号】：A81

【相似文献】