马克思主义经典作家语境下的农民
发布时间：2018-07-15 13:51
【摘要】：考查马克思主义经典作家与农民相关的文本发现:尽管恩格斯和列宁对农民的分类有所差异,但是从本质上都是按照经营性质作为分类标准,其文本中重点考察的对象具有内在的一致性,即在经营性质处于被剥削地位的、人数众多的农业小生产者这类农民。他们表现出作为小生产者在经济上的根深蒂固的私有性、在政治影响上的被行政权力支配性和在思想上具有落后保守性,这些属性相辅相成、相互促进。并且,马克思主义经典作家在不同程度上指出,农业小生产者将逐渐走向衰落和终结或分化,提出向合作社的生产和占有的方向改造或在取得政权以后逐步发展集体所有制。
[Abstract]:A review of the texts of Marxist classic writers related to farmers reveals that, although Engels and Lenin differ in their classification of peasants, they are essentially classified according to the nature of management. There is an inherent consistency in the study of the objects in the text, that is, the large number of farmers such as small agricultural producers who are in the exploitative position in the nature of management. As small producers, they have deep-rooted private property in economy, are dominated by administrative power in political influence and have backward conservatism in thought. These attributes complement each other and promote each other. Moreover, the classical Marxist writers point out to varying degrees that the agricultural small producers will gradually decline and end or differentiate, and propose to reform the production and occupation of cooperatives or to develop collective ownership after gaining political power.
【作者单位】： 广西师范大学法学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金项目“马克思主义的农民合作理论及其当代价值”(2014M552289)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A81
本文编号：2124286
[Abstract]:A review of the texts of Marxist classic writers related to farmers reveals that, although Engels and Lenin differ in their classification of peasants, they are essentially classified according to the nature of management. There is an inherent consistency in the study of the objects in the text, that is, the large number of farmers such as small agricultural producers who are in the exploitative position in the nature of management. As small producers, they have deep-rooted private property in economy, are dominated by administrative power in political influence and have backward conservatism in thought. These attributes complement each other and promote each other. Moreover, the classical Marxist writers point out to varying degrees that the agricultural small producers will gradually decline and end or differentiate, and propose to reform the production and occupation of cooperatives or to develop collective ownership after gaining political power.
【作者单位】： 广西师范大学法学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金项目“马克思主义的农民合作理论及其当代价值”(2014M552289)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A81
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 李志凯;劳动力的私有性是社会主义社会商品经济存在的根本原因[J];理论导刊;1996年12期
2 陈潮;刘瑶;;新经济组织党建工作的基本特点[J];现代企业教育;2008年18期
3 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 高东岭;技术佐证 MPLS-VPN，安全有据可循[N];网络世界;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 潘华琴;文学言语的私有性[D];苏州大学;2007年
，本文编号：2124286
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2124286.html
