社会形态的空间界画——试论马克思关于历史考量的空间尺度

发布时间：2018-11-27 19:26

【摘要】：马克思关于人类社会形态演变的唯物史观探索多方面地考察和诠释了人类社会历史划界的问题。马克思先后从三个方面提出了界划人类历史发展的标尺:一是社会的生产方式尺度,二是社会主体生存状态尺度,三是以城乡历史格局为坐标的空间尺度。学术界对前两种界划方式进行了大量研究和诠释,但对于"空间尺度"及其界说人类社会形态的解释机理,却少有论述。马克思将社会经济方式以及整个历史活动都纳入城乡空间结构加以考察,因而以历史活动的城乡空间坐标为尺度,去说明人类社会的样态,既是一个深刻而现实的社会本体论问题,更是一个复杂的社会认知辩证法问题。按照马克思的逻辑回置于社会演变的历史过程,从各历史时期之城乡空间的具体型塑,对社会生产方式的反身"生产"及其真实表征,去审察和揭示社会形态演变与城乡空间关系建构的相关律,具有十分重要的意义。
[Abstract]:Marx's historical materialism on the evolution of human social formation explores and interprets the historical demarcation of human society in many ways. Marx has put forward the scale of dividing the development of human history from three aspects: one is the scale of the social production mode, the other is the living state scale of the social subject, and the third is the spatial scale based on the historical pattern of urban and rural areas. The academic circles have made a great deal of research and interpretation on the former two ways of demarcation, but there is little discussion on the explanation mechanism of "spatial scale" and its definition of human social formation. Marx took the social and economic mode and the whole historical activities into the urban and rural spatial structure to investigate, thus taking the urban and rural spatial coordinates of the historical activities as the yardstick, to explain the human social pattern. It is not only a profound and realistic problem of social ontology, but also a complex problem of social cognitive dialectics. According to the historical process of Marx's logic, from the concrete model of urban and rural space in every historical period, the reflexive "production" of social production mode and its true representation are discussed. It is of great significance to examine and reveal the relevant laws between the evolution of social form and the construction of spatial relationship between urban and rural areas.
【作者单位】：广州大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学重点课题“唯物史观视域中的空间问题研究”(编号13AZX005)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：A811

【共引文献】