马克思和海德格尔技术思想比较研究
发布时间：2018-12-06 11:29
【摘要】：现代技术影响着人类的各个方面,引发了无数思想家和哲人对技术的思考。马克思以人类的全面发展为契机,在辩证唯物主义思想的指导下研究技术,探讨了劳动的异化问题,提出了人的全面发展的目标和实现途径。海德格尔以现象学的方法为工具,通过对“存在”这个现时代的命运的追问,探讨了技术的本质——集置,提出了诗意的栖居。虽然他们二人的立场、出发点、方法不同,但是在他们的运思中都昭示了一个共同的方向,即探讨和研究如何面对技术对人类世界各种影响,实现人的自由和全面发展。 本文共分以下几部分。绪论,综述国内外研究现状与选题依据以及技术、现代科学和形而上学的关系。第一章是马克思的技术观,笔者介绍了马克思技术思想产生的背景、技术的本质和马克思对技术作用的认识。第二章是海德格尔的技术观,介绍海德格尔技术思想产生的背景以及海德格尔对技术的追问和技术本质的认识。第三章是马克思与海德格尔在技术之思上的比较,本章又分为三个部分。首先介绍他们的方法论基础,展现解构技术的两把利刃；然后讲了异化劳动与集置,也就是他们二人关于技术的批判和解构；接下来是人的全面发展与诗意栖居,比较了技术时代诸条件下人类的获救之途。最后一部分是结语,通过对马克思和海德格尔技术思想的综合论述,进一步展现二人消解技术的负面因素之相同或者相似处,启示今人更好的生存和发展。
[Abstract]:Modern technology affects all aspects of human beings and causes countless thinkers and philosophers to think about technology. Taking the all-round development of human being as an opportunity, Marx studied the technology under the guidance of dialectical materialism, discussed the alienation of labor, and put forward the goal and the way to realize the all-round development of human being. With the method of phenomenology as a tool, Heidegger explores the essence of technology by questioning the fate of "being" in the present age, and puts forward a poetic dwelling. Although their positions, starting points and methods are different, they all show a common direction in their thinking, that is, to explore and study how to face the various influences of technology on the human world and to realize the free and all-round development of human beings. This paper is divided into the following parts. The introduction summarizes the relationship between domestic and foreign research status and the basis of topic selection, technology, modern science and metaphysics. The first chapter is Marx's view of technology, the author introduces the background of Marx's technological thought, the nature of technology and Marx's understanding of the role of technology. The second chapter is Heidegger's view of technology, introduces the background of Heidegger's thought of technology and Heidegger's understanding of the nature of technology. The third chapter is the comparison of Marx and Heidegger in the thought of technology, this chapter is divided into three parts. First of all, it introduces their methodological foundation and shows the two sharp blades of deconstruction technology, and then discusses the alienation of labor and collection, that is, their criticism and deconstruction of technology. Then there is a comprehensive development and poetic dwelling, comparing the ways of human salvation under the conditions of the technological age. The last part is the conclusion, through the comprehensive exposition of Marx and Heidegger's technical thought, the author further shows the similarities or similarities of the negative factors of the two dissolving technology, and enlightens the modern people to survive and develop better.
【学位授予单位】：昆明理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：A811;B516.54
本文编号：2365959
[Abstract]:Modern technology affects all aspects of human beings and causes countless thinkers and philosophers to think about technology. Taking the all-round development of human being as an opportunity, Marx studied the technology under the guidance of dialectical materialism, discussed the alienation of labor, and put forward the goal and the way to realize the all-round development of human being. With the method of phenomenology as a tool, Heidegger explores the essence of technology by questioning the fate of "being" in the present age, and puts forward a poetic dwelling. Although their positions, starting points and methods are different, they all show a common direction in their thinking, that is, to explore and study how to face the various influences of technology on the human world and to realize the free and all-round development of human beings. This paper is divided into the following parts. The introduction summarizes the relationship between domestic and foreign research status and the basis of topic selection, technology, modern science and metaphysics. The first chapter is Marx's view of technology, the author introduces the background of Marx's technological thought, the nature of technology and Marx's understanding of the role of technology. The second chapter is Heidegger's view of technology, introduces the background of Heidegger's thought of technology and Heidegger's understanding of the nature of technology. The third chapter is the comparison of Marx and Heidegger in the thought of technology, this chapter is divided into three parts. First of all, it introduces their methodological foundation and shows the two sharp blades of deconstruction technology, and then discusses the alienation of labor and collection, that is, their criticism and deconstruction of technology. Then there is a comprehensive development and poetic dwelling, comparing the ways of human salvation under the conditions of the technological age. The last part is the conclusion, through the comprehensive exposition of Marx and Heidegger's technical thought, the author further shows the similarities or similarities of the negative factors of the two dissolving technology, and enlightens the modern people to survive and develop better.
【学位授予单位】：昆明理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：A811;B516.54
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李轶;;试比较马克思和海德格尔的技术批判思想[J];学理论;2010年28期
2 吴书林;;马克思和海德格尔技术本质观的比较研究[J];学理论;2011年15期
3 师庭雄;;准则与自由——从准则的获取看纯粹理性在实践运用中的辨证论[J];兰州大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期
4 师庭雄;;作为存在之命运的技术的本质[J];江汉大学学报(人文科学版);2009年03期
5 路春梅;;马克思和海德格尔的技术批判思想比较分析[J];新疆大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年03期
6 陈志刚;马克思和海德格尔的技术批判思想之比较[J];自然辩证法研究;2002年02期
7 俞吾金;从“道德评价优先”到“历史评价优先”——马克思异化理论发展中的视角转换[J];中国社会科学;2003年02期
8 侯才;有关“异化”概念的几点辨析[J];哲学研究;2001年10期
9 师庭雄;;海德格尔对生存论诸环节的次序调整及其启示[J];哲学研究;2011年03期
10 师庭雄;;从真理立场的改变看海德格尔“存在”运思的转换[J];世界哲学;2011年01期
，本文编号：2365959
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/makesizhuyiyanjiu/2365959.html
