法治语境下盗窃罪治理模式探究——基于犯罪统计的分析

发布时间：2018-04-21 01:42

本文选题：盗窃罪 + 二元制　；参考：《现代法学》2017年03期

【摘要】：我国对于盗窃行为采取行政违法和刑事违法的二元制治理模式,其中,盗窃数额是划分盗窃治安案件和刑事案件(即盗窃罪)的重要标准。盗窃行为二元制治理模式虽然为时久远,且富有效率,但也存在犯罪数量前后可比基准不一致、刑事政策制定依据偏离客观事实、警察权过大、司法权受限、难以对盗窃案件进行统一、科学、有效治理等问题。为了解决二元制治理模式产生的弊端,基于法治语境和相对优势理论,可以考虑将我国《治安管理处罚法》中的盗窃行为全部纳入刑法,以盗窃罪予以处置,尝试建立一元制的盗窃罪治理模式,此举可以大大提升犯罪治理的法治化。
[Abstract]:Our country adopts the dual system governance mode of administrative and criminal illegal behavior, in which the amount of theft is an important standard to divide the theft case from the criminal case (that is, theft crime). Although the governance model of dual system of theft is long and efficient, there is also the inconsistency of comparable benchmark in the number of crimes, the basis of criminal policy making deviates from the objective facts, the police power is too large, and the judicial power is limited. Difficult to the theft case unified, scientific, effective governance and other issues. In order to solve the malpractice of dualistic governance mode, based on the context of the rule of law and the theory of comparative advantage, we can consider that the theft behavior in the Public Security Management punishment Law of our country should be brought into the criminal law to deal with the crime of larceny. Try to establish one-dollar system of larceny governance model, this can greatly improve the governance of crime.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：浙江工商大学法学基地科研项目“全面推进依法治国与犯罪治理模式变革研究”(2015C001)
【分类号】：D924.3

【相似文献】