西方学术话语与东方史学脉络——以“Medieval”为例

发布时间：2018-05-20 13:58

本文选题：medieval + 中古　；参考：《人文杂志》2010年02期

【摘要】：中国史学语言已经非常西方化了。一些我们习以为常的概念,其实有复杂的西方学术背景,并不是中国学术固有的术语。将这些概念还原到其西方学术脉络中,还原到其传入中国学术的历史背景中去,有助于我们更好地理解这些概念的真实涵义,对于历史研究也有重要的意义。"medieval"或者"middleages"是欧洲史学家在17世纪开始构建出来的一个历史阶段,在此之前,欧洲主流的历史观是antiqui-moderni(古-今)模式。欧洲史学家之所以在"古"和"今"之间构建出一个"中世纪"阶段,有其深厚而复杂的文化历史背景。从17世纪末开始,ancient-medieval-modern这种三段式的历史观成为主流。而后,随着西方文化霸权在全球的扩张,自19世纪末开始,这一历史架构逐渐被欧洲文明之外的文化体,主动或者被动的接受为描述本国历史的主流模式。本文的目的在于探索其西方学术背景及其融入东方学术脉络的历史。
[Abstract]:The language of Chinese historiography has been very westernized. Some of the concepts we take for granted have a complex Western academic background and are not an inherent term in Chinese academia. To restore these concepts to their western academic context and to the historical background in which they were introduced into Chinese academia will help us better understand the true meaning of these concepts. "medieval" or "middleages" is a historical stage that European historians began to construct in the 17th century. Before that, the mainstream historical view in Europe was the antiqui-modernie model. European historians have a profound and complicated cultural and historical background to construct a "medieval period" between "ancient" and "present". Since the end of the 17 th century, the three-paragraph view of history, the ancient-medieval-modern, has become the mainstream. Then, with the expansion of Western cultural hegemony in the world, since the end of the 19th century, this historical framework has been gradually accepted as the mainstream mode of describing the history of our country by the cultural bodies outside of European civilization, either actively or passively. The purpose of this paper is to explore its western academic background and the history of its integration into the oriental academic context.
【作者单位】：复旦大学文史研究院;
【基金】：复旦大学“985工程”哲学社会科学创新基地2009年度研究项目“批判的理解国际中国学”的支持(项目批准号09FCZD005)
【分类号】：K09

【参考文献】