中国科技史与考古学:历史回顾

发布时间：2018-05-21 07:35

本文选题：科学技术史 + 考古学　；参考：《自然科学史研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：中国科技史的建制化略晚于中国考古学,并从中得到了许多滋养。尽管目前中国考古学对科技史的容纳程度有限,但从历史角度来看,两者曾经的密切关系也有迹可循。中国科技史与考古学的关系可分为四个时期,分别以1957年、1980年、2004年为节点。早期科技史家与考古学家保持着良好关系,王t、梁思成、竺可桢、王振铎等是其中代表。夏鼐与柯俊的交往是中国考古学家和科技史家交往的典范:夏鼐撰写了许多科技史文章,与科技史家们来往频繁,促进了中国科技史与考古学交融;柯俊在其帮助下,开展了商代铁刃铜钺、晋代周处墓"铝片"等有重要影响的研究工作。科技考古在这种情况下应运而生,成为科技史与考古学之间重要的桥梁。在新的历史时期,科技史与考古学将沿着各自轨迹发展,由"术"而"学",共同促进学术繁荣。
[Abstract]:The institutionalization of Chinese history of science and technology was slightly later than that of Chinese archaeology, from which much nourishment was gained. Although the Chinese archaeology has a limited capacity for the history of science and technology at present, from the historical point of view, the close relationship between the two has a trace. The relationship between Chinese history of science and technology and archaeology can be divided into four periods: 1957, 1980 and 2004. Early historians of science and technology maintain good relations with archaeologists, such as Wang tou, Liang Sicheng, Zhu Kezhen, Wang Zhenduo and so on. The interaction between Xia Nai and Ke Jun is a model for Chinese archaeologists and historians of science and technology: Xia Nai wrote many articles on the history of science and technology, and made frequent contacts with historians of science and technology, which promoted the blending of Chinese history of science and technology with archaeology; with the help of Ke Jun, The important research work was carried out, such as Shang Dynasty iron blade copper axe, Jin Dynasty Zhou tomb "aluminum chip" and so on. Archaeology of science and technology emerges as the times require under this circumstance, become the important bridge between history of science and technology and archaeology. In the new historical period, the history of science and technology and archaeology will develop along their respective tracks, from "technology" to "learning", jointly promoting academic prosperity.
【作者单位】：北京科技大学科技史与文化遗产研究院;
【分类号】：K092;N09

【相似文献】