魏玛德国“历史传记之争”及其史学启示

发布时间：2018-05-22 17:34

本文选题：魏玛共和国 + 路德维希　；参考：《历史研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：在20世纪20年代的德国,围绕历史传记的目的、写法与本质等问题,专业历史学家与红极一时的传记作家埃米尔·路德维希在公共领域展开了一场大辩论。除却它所涉及到的政治立场之争外,将之界定为"新史学"还是"历史通俗文学"的讨论,实际上关涉论辩双方对19世纪以来史学功能与书写形式的不同认识,应被视作历史主义危机的表现之一。这场争议虽然因路德维希的个人命运变化、其观点的肤浅性以及反对势力的强大与顽固而不了了之,但在德国史学范式最终告别历史主义后,它获得了被重新解读的契机,并让专业历史学家们再次思考公共历史文化机制合理化的方法及其必要性。
[Abstract]:In Germany in the 1920s, the professional historian and the popular biographer Emile Ludwig launched a great debate in the public sphere over the purpose, writing and nature of historical biographies. Apart from the controversy over the political position involved in it, the discussion of defining it as "new historiography" or "historical popular literature" is in fact concerned with the different views of both sides on the function and writing form of historiography since the 19th century. It should be seen as one of the manifestations of a crisis of historicism. Although the controversy was dismissed by Ludwig's personal fate, the superficial nature of his views and the strength and stubbornness of the opposition, it gained a chance to be reinterpreted after the German historiography paradigm finally broke away from historicism. And let professional historians reconsider the methods and necessity of rationalizing public historical and cultural mechanisms.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学历史学系;
【基金】：2014年上海曙光计划的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：K095.16

【相似文献】