中国历史疆域的形态与知识话语

发布时间：2018-05-24 10:45

本文选题：中国边疆 + 知识　；参考：《学术月刊》2017年02期

【摘要】：冯建勇认为民族国家体系、殖民主义理论可用于解释西欧国家历史疆域和当代世界国家边界形成的一般过程,但亦应观察到民族国家体系、殖民主义理论是由特定经验条件催生的规范性体系。用这些理论解释中国历史疆域问题并不具有历史应然的超越性,对于中国而言,前近代王朝国家"天下主义"的疆域观维系中国历史疆域形态的解释,尊重了中国的历史、传统和文化,无疑更具历史合理性。李鸿宾认为唐建立了兼跨长城南北两种(或多种)迥然有别的地域及其族群为一体的政权,并成功地实施达五十余年,主要建基于传统的天下观的思想意识,尤其是统治集团北方胡系文化血脉的促动使然。南北的兼跨,使得长城边缘地带的特性丧失,它转而成为沟通南北东西的战略要地。这样的尝试为后来蒙古和满洲贵族势力构建一统化异质型帝国奠定了新的基础。长城地带意涵的本质是中国传统王朝国家不断建构与变迁的展现。姚大力认为面对边疆民族史研究的主位取径以及对于族群认同问题的新认识,现地语史料的重要性只会变得越来越突出。因为大量的主位叙事,以及与主位叙事密切相关的其他种种历史信息,事实上是蕴藏在现地语史料之中。历史书写往上走必须上升到理论的宏观层面;向下走必须坐落在细部考察与分析所必不可少的精密技术的基础上。高亚滨认为新疆南疆绿洲社会因其独特的自然生态环境而形成了具有强烈地方特征的社会文化结构,就现代国家的发展要求来看,这种文化结构则成为落后、保守的象征,需要国家力量的介入以完成社会的现代化。从生态环境、文化网络的角度理解绿洲社会的权力结构,则为探讨边疆地域社会现代化的历史进程提供一种知识话语的可能。
[Abstract]:Feng Jianyong believed that the nation-state system, the theory of colonialism, could be used to explain the general process of the formation of the historical boundaries of Western European countries and the borders of contemporary world countries, but it should also be observed that nation-state systems should be observed. The theory of colonialism is a normative system created by specific experience conditions. Using these theories to explain the problem of China's historical territory does not have the transcendence of history. For China, the former modern dynasty's "world doctrine" of the territory concept maintained the form of China's historical territory and respected the history of China. Tradition and culture, no doubt more historical rationality. Li Hongbin believed that Tang established two (or more) regimes that span the north and south of the Great Wall and had different regions and ethnic groups, and successfully implemented them for more than 50 years, mainly based on the ideological consciousness of the traditional view of the world. In particular, the ruling group of northern Hu is the promotion of cultural blood. The combination of the north and the south makes the Great Wall marginal zone lose its character, and it becomes a strategic place to connect the north and the south. Such attempts laid a new foundation for the later Mongol and Manchu aristocrats to build a unified heterogeneous empire. The essence of the Great Wall zone is the continuous construction and change of Chinese traditional dynasty country. Yao strongly believes that in the face of the theme of frontier ethnic history research and the new understanding of ethnic identity, the importance of local language historical materials will only become more and more prominent. Because a large number of thematic narratives, and other historical information closely related to thematic narration, are in fact contained in the historical data of locale language. The historical writing must rise to the macroscopic level of the theory and must be located on the basis of the precision technology necessary for the detailed investigation and analysis. Gao Yabin believes that the oasis society in southern Xinjiang has formed a social and cultural structure with strong local characteristics because of its unique natural ecological environment. In view of the development requirements of modern countries, this cultural structure has become a symbol of backwardness and conservatism. The intervention of national forces is needed to modernize society. Understanding the power structure of oasis society from the angle of ecological environment and cultural network provides a possibility of knowledge discourse for exploring the historical process of social modernization in frontier areas.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院中国边疆研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金“150年来中国边疆研究学术思想史”(15BZS108)、国家社科基金重大招标项目《中国疆域最终奠定的路径与模式研究》(15ZDB028)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K092

【参考文献】