“由旧入新”与“无中生有”:民国初年的文史之学
发布时间：2019-08-16 19:52
【摘要】：处于激烈反帝制革命之后和艰苦反复辟斗争之中的"民国初年",是被中国近现代学术史研究忽视的时期。作为中国文史之学从传统向现代嬗变的时期,"民国初年"并非仅仅是无意义的"萧条"和"颓废",实际上也孕育着现代文史之学确立需要的积极因素:学术研究的观念与范式、学术研究的风气与人才,正在发生"由旧入新"的蜕变;现代、独立、专业的文史学科或辅助学科,开始"无中生有"的建立,并取得一些引人关注的成绩;传统的各种观念逐渐趋于边缘化,从全球视野中观察、定位、塑造、鞭策自己的"世界维度"在学人群体中生成。这些"由旧入新"和"无中生有"的积极因素,为20世纪20年代现代文史之学的蓬勃发展奠定了基础。关注高峰、追逐热点与推崇新颖,是中国当前学术史研究的惯常作业方式。在继承这一优点的同时,我们也应该尝试将目光向低潮、边缘和日常投射。只有如此,我们写出的学术史才会全面可信,才能更有助于当下的学术界寻找自我。
[Abstract]:The early years of the Republic of China, which was in the midst of the fierce anti-imperialist revolution and the arduous struggle against restoration, was ignored by the study of the academic history of modern China. As a period during which the study of Chinese literature and history evolved from traditional to modern, the early years of the Republic of China were not only meaningless "depression" and "decadence", but also gave birth to the positive factors needed for the establishment of modern literature and history: the concept and paradigm of academic research, the atmosphere and talents of academic research, are changing from the old to the new; Modern, independent, professional literary and historical disciplines or auxiliary disciplines, began to "out of nothing" the establishment, and made some interesting achievements; the traditional concepts gradually tend to marginalization, from the global perspective to observe, position, shape, spur their own "world dimension" in the formation of scholars. These positive factors of "from the old to the new" and "born out of nothing" laid the foundation for the vigorous development of modern literature and history in the 1920s. It is the usual way to pay attention to the peak, chase hot spots and admire novelty in the current academic history research in China. While inheriting this advantage, we should also try to project our eyes to low tide, edge and daily. Only in this way, the academic history we write will be comprehensive and credible, and can be more helpful for the current academic circles to find themselves.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学历史学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金“明德青年学者”项目(13XNJ021)
【分类号】：K092
本文编号：2527620
[Abstract]:The early years of the Republic of China, which was in the midst of the fierce anti-imperialist revolution and the arduous struggle against restoration, was ignored by the study of the academic history of modern China. As a period during which the study of Chinese literature and history evolved from traditional to modern, the early years of the Republic of China were not only meaningless "depression" and "decadence", but also gave birth to the positive factors needed for the establishment of modern literature and history: the concept and paradigm of academic research, the atmosphere and talents of academic research, are changing from the old to the new; Modern, independent, professional literary and historical disciplines or auxiliary disciplines, began to "out of nothing" the establishment, and made some interesting achievements; the traditional concepts gradually tend to marginalization, from the global perspective to observe, position, shape, spur their own "world dimension" in the formation of scholars. These positive factors of "from the old to the new" and "born out of nothing" laid the foundation for the vigorous development of modern literature and history in the 1920s. It is the usual way to pay attention to the peak, chase hot spots and admire novelty in the current academic history research in China. While inheriting this advantage, we should also try to project our eyes to low tide, edge and daily. Only in this way, the academic history we write will be comprehensive and credible, and can be more helpful for the current academic circles to find themselves.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学历史学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金“明德青年学者”项目(13XNJ021)
【分类号】：K092
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 侯外庐;;深沉的怀念——纪念杜国庠同志逝世二十周年[J];学术研究;1981年01期
2 武少民,闫玉环;侯外庐与清代学术史研究[J];长春师范学院学报;2005年06期
3 ;[J];;年期
，本文编号：2527620
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/sxll/2527620.html
