当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 文化论文 >

当前国家文化治理能力建构的路径选择探析

发布时间:2018-04-16 00:21

  本文选题:文化治理 + 国家治理能力 ; 参考:《曲阜师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:在国家治理体系与国家治理能力现代化建构中,文化治理及其能力建设是重要组成部分。学术界对国家文化治理能力的关注,源自早期英国的伯明翰学派,历经马克思主义和葛兰西“文化霸权”思想的影响,经过早期台湾地区的王志弘等人的影响,将文化治理理念带入中国,形成了对国家文化治理能力的政府与文化治理间的相互作用;政府对于文化治理的制度和措施性安排起到了宏观调控的重要作用;政府与文化治理起到了应对于公民合理化、服务化的要求原则;政府对于文化治理问题应该有着具体管控力和与社会、政治、经济、生态等方面相适应为出发点,注重文化对于市民的主体利益等方面的共识,加强政府与传统文化之间的协同力,体现出国家政策对公民的整体利益的需求,给予更多的政策灵活力和实施灵活度,更大程度上体现出国家治理能力中文化治理带来的巨大附和力,给予路径选择中多层次的参考方向,直接性的增加了改革的创新力度和社会价值。本文基于文化治理建构过程中的五种能力下的基础能力、决策能力、文化建构能力、评估能力、监控能力,建构中国国家文化治理能力体系具体细节方案,并对以上文化治理能力的子能力下具体的优缺点及路径改善的对策研究进行详细研究,在国家治理能力和治理能力现代化建设的过程中,文化治理是中流砥柱的作用,传统文化的弘扬和发展过程中更是给予了国家治理中更多中国特色的政策研究选择,在深化改革发展的今天,文化治理对国家宏观政策的调整给予了特有的中国智慧,相对于未来发展的趋势,政府无疑更多的需要深入发展创新切实有效的政策来提升国家治理现代化的建设能力,而其中细微分支下的五种能力的建构就显得尤为重要,文章在国家文化治理能力建构下的当今存在的问题,在子能力下选择和改善中提出了文化治理的政策研究和路径选择探析,但从当前研究看,文化治理能力仍存在着阶段性不足,在具体能力的分析层面上仍然比较浅显等方面的不足,需未来进一步在研究中进行深化与拓展。
[Abstract]:In the modernization construction of national governance system and national governance capacity, cultural governance and its capacity building are important components.Academic attention to the ability of national cultural governance originated from the Birmingham School in early England, experienced the influence of Marxism and Gramsci's thought of "cultural hegemony", and passed through the influence of Wang Zhihong and others in the early Taiwan area.Bringing the concept of cultural governance into China has formed the interaction between the government and the cultural governance of the national cultural governance, and the government has played an important role in macro-control of the institutions and measures of cultural governance.The government and cultural governance have played the principle of responding to the requirements of citizens' rationalization and service. The government should have specific control over cultural governance issues and adapt to the social, political, economic, ecological and other aspects as the starting point.Pay attention to the cultural consensus on the main interests of the citizens, strengthen the synergy between the government and the traditional culture, reflect the demand of the state policy for the citizens' overall interests, and give more policy vitality and flexibility to the implementation.To a greater extent, it reflects the huge echo force brought by the cultural governance in the national governance ability, and gives a multi-level reference direction in the path selection, which directly increases the innovation strength and social value of the reform.This paper is based on the basic ability, decision making ability, cultural construction ability, evaluation ability, monitoring ability, and the concrete detail scheme of constructing the Chinese national cultural governance ability system under the five kinds of abilities in the process of cultural governance construction.The paper also makes a detailed study on the specific advantages and disadvantages of the above sub-abilities of cultural governance and the countermeasures to improve the path. In the process of modernization construction of the national governance ability and governance capacity, cultural governance is the mainstay of the role.In the process of carrying forward and developing traditional culture, it has given more policy research options with Chinese characteristics in the process of national governance. In today's deepening of reform and development, cultural governance has given unique Chinese wisdom to the adjustment of the state's macro policy.Compared with the trend of future development, the government undoubtedly needs more in-depth development of innovative and effective policies to enhance the building capacity of national governance modernization, and the construction of five kinds of capabilities under the minor branches is particularly important.The article puts forward the policy research and path choice of cultural governance in the process of choosing and improving the national cultural governance ability, but from the perspective of current research, the paper analyzes the existing problems under the construction of the national cultural governance ability.The ability of cultural governance is still deficient in stages, and is still relatively simple on the level of analysis of concrete ability, which needs to be further deepened and expanded in the future.
【学位授予单位】:曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G120

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 周伟;;跨域公共问题协同治理:理论预期、实践难题与路径选择[J];甘肃社会科学;2015年02期

2 张鸿雁;;“文化治理模式”的理论与实践创新——建构全面深化改革的“文化自觉”与“文化自为”[J];社会科学;2015年03期

3 胡惠林;;在文化发展的实践中推进文化理论的创造性发展[J];中国编辑;2015年02期

4 毛少莹;;文化治理及其国际经验[J];中国文化产业评论;2014年02期

5 张鸿雁;;核心价值文化认同的建构与文化治理——深化改革文化治理创新的模式与入径[J];南京社会科学;2015年01期

6 王京生;;文化治理与文化权利[J];教育文化论坛;2014年06期

7 俞可平;;没有法治就没有善治——浅谈法治与国家治理现代化[J];马克思主义与现实;2014年06期

8 李林;;依法治国与推进国家治理现代化[J];法学研究;2014年05期

9 陈福今;;切实转变政府职能 提升文化治理能力[J];行政管理改革;2014年09期

10 徐一超;;“文化治理”:文化研究的“新”视域[J];文化艺术研究;2014年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 张文显;;法治中国建设的重大任务[N];法制日报;2014年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 谢新松;文化的社会治理功能研究[D];云南大学;2013年



本文编号:1756472

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/wenhuayichanlunwen/1756472.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3397f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com