论刘敞在北宋的学术地位

发布时间：2018-01-23 22:07

本文关键词： 刘敞北宋经学学术地位　出处：《史学月刊》2013年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：北宋元yP史官认为刘敞及其《七经小传》在当朝学风转变中具有标志性地位,近些年来有学者对此说提出质疑。《神宗实录》和《神宗正史》的修撰经历及此说在其间被递相沿用的事实,表明此说已多次获得新党的认可;与孙复、胡瑗、石介和周敦颐相比,刘敞最早有经学著作传世,其学术影响的确立远早于胡瑗和周敦颐;在宋人看来,刘敞之学是有别于胡瑗、石介、周敦颐之"道学"的"六经之学",相较于孙复,他又得经学之正统。故元yP史官对刘敞学术地位的认定实为知见,不可怀疑。这一疑议,反映出后世学者在宋代学术思想史的内容解读以及选择、编排研究对象的依据等问题上存有歧见。
[Abstract]:In Northern Song Dynasty and Yuan Dynasty, the historiographers of YP thought that Liu Chang and his "Seven Classics" had an iconic position in the transformation of the style of study. In recent years, some scholars have questioned this theory. The compilation experience of the works of Shenzong and the True History of Shenzong and the fact that this theory was passed along in the course of this theory shows that this theory has been approved by the New Party many times; Compared with Sun Fu, Hu Yuan, Shi Jie and Zhou Dunyi, Liu Chang was the earliest scholar of Confucian classics, whose academic influence was established far earlier than Hu Yuan and Zhou Dunyi. In Song Dynasty, Liu Chang's study is different from that of Hu Yuan, Shi Jie and Zhou Dunyi's "study of the six Classics", compared with Sun Fu. He also got the orthodoxy of Confucian classics. Therefore, the Yuan YP historiographer's opinion on Liu Chang's academic status can not be doubted. This doubt reflects the interpretation and choice of the content of later scholars in the history of academic thought in the Song Dynasty. There are differences of opinion on the basis of arranging the object of study.
【作者单位】：山东大学历史文化学院;
【基金】：山东大学儒学高等研究院一般项目“南宋《春秋》学研究” 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金中国博士后科学基金(2012M511484)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：B244;K244
【正文快照】： 后世学者论北宋中期经学风气的转折,常引晁公武、吴曾、王应麟等人著作中的相关论(录)说,而这些说法多涉及刘敞。如晁公武《郡斋读书志》卷四刘敞“《七经小传》五卷”条解题云:元yP史官谓:“庆历前学者尚文辞,多守章句注疏之学,至敞始异诸儒之说,后王安石修《经义》,盖本于

【共引文献】