《左传》叙事与弑君凡例之关系

发布时间：2018-02-16 08:39

本文关键词： 左传春秋叙事弑君凡例　出处：《清华大学》2006年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 《左传》是一部充满争议的古代典籍,历代学者围绕着《左传》的作者、写作时代及其与《春秋》的关系等问题展开争论,时至今日也无法达成共识。在这些争论中有一个比较重要的问题是《左传》叙事与解经义例之间的关系。坚持《左传》传经性质的学者强调二者的相辅相成,坚持《左传》原是独立史书的学者则认为义例为后人所添加。本文抛开门户之见,承认《左传》叙事对于解释《春秋》的重要意义,同时又通过大量的案例分析,指出《左传》叙事与弑君凡例之间存在一种紧张关系,从而说明《左传》叙事与解经义例之间确实存在不相吻合的情况。至于这种张力产生的原因,人们可以做出各种解释,本文从叙事的自身特点出发,认为叙事在解经的同时还表达了叙事者的自身思想,这可能是导致张力产生的一个原因。
[Abstract]:Zuo Zhuan is a controversial ancient book. Scholars of all dynasties have been unable to reach a consensus about the author of Zuo Zhuan, the time of writing and the relationship between Zuo Zhuan and Spring and Autumn. One of the more important issues in these debates is the relationship between the narration of Zuo Zhuan and the interpretation of the scriptures. Scholars who insist on the nature of Zuo Zhuan emphasize that the two complement each other. The scholars who insisted that Zuo Zhuan was an independent historical book thought that the semantic example was added by later generations. This paper puts aside his own opinions, acknowledges the significance of the narrative of Zuo Zhuan in explaining the Spring and Autumn period, and points out that there is a tense relationship between the narration of Zuo Zhuan and the ordinary example of regicide through a large number of case studies. It shows that the narration of Zuo Zhuan does not coincide with the interpretation of the scriptures. As for the causes of this tension, people can make all kinds of explanations. This article starts from the characteristics of the narration. It is believed that the narration expresses the narrator's own thoughts while interpreting the sutras, which may be one of the reasons leading to tension.
【学位授予单位】：清华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：K225

【参考文献】