康熙十五年状元彭定求生平史实述略
发布时间:2018-12-30 20:19
【摘要】:康熙十五年(1676年)状元彭定求,宦迹萧然,但声名赫赫,以科名、理学和文学闻名于世,是苏州彭氏家族兴盛的关键人物。清代各类官私史籍与地方志书对其记载皆简略缺漏,尤以《清史稿》最为严重,《清史稿》对彭氏字号、科举、职官履历和卒年四个方面的史实记载均误。本文根据有关彭定求的传记资料及其自撰《生圹志》,参稽其他文献,从苏州彭氏家族、彭定求生平字号和科举仕途三个方面,对彭定求生平史实进行考证,以期廓清相关史籍记载之误。
[Abstract]:In the 15th year (1676) of Kangxi (1676), Peng Dingqiu, an official, was famous for his family name, Neo-Confucianism and literature, and was a key figure in the prosperity of the Peng family in Suzhou. In the Qing Dynasty, all kinds of official and private historical books and local chronicles were short of their records, especially the "draft of the Qing Dynasty" was the most serious, and the "draft of the Qing Dynasty" was false to the historical facts of Peng's name, imperial examination, official resume and the year of death. Based on the biographies of Peng Dingqiu and his own biographies, and consulting other documents, this paper makes textual research on the historical facts of Peng Dingqiu's life from the three aspects of the Peng family in Suzhou, Peng Dingqiu's biographies and the official career of the imperial examination. In order to clarify the related historical records of error.
【作者单位】: 苏州科技学院;
【分类号】:K249.2
[Abstract]:In the 15th year (1676) of Kangxi (1676), Peng Dingqiu, an official, was famous for his family name, Neo-Confucianism and literature, and was a key figure in the prosperity of the Peng family in Suzhou. In the Qing Dynasty, all kinds of official and private historical books and local chronicles were short of their records, especially the "draft of the Qing Dynasty" was the most serious, and the "draft of the Qing Dynasty" was false to the historical facts of Peng's name, imperial examination, official resume and the year of death. Based on the biographies of Peng Dingqiu and his own biographies, and consulting other documents, this paper makes textual research on the historical facts of Peng Dingqiu's life from the three aspects of the Peng family in Suzhou, Peng Dingqiu's biographies and the official career of the imperial examination. In order to clarify the related historical records of error.
【作者单位】: 苏州科技学院;
【分类号】:K249.2
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘洪强;;“东吴弄珠客”考[J];阿坝师范高等专科学校学报;2009年01期
2 曾肖;;文章作法自不同 十年论争缘意气——论明末时文大家艾南英与复社之关系[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年04期
3 方旭玲;;清代桐城进士数量考[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
4 李波;;清代庄子散文研究家刘凤苞行年考[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2011年07期
5 汪孔丰;;谫论秦瀛与桐城派、阳湖派的关系[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2011年07期
6 王成兰;;清初京师汉官的生活空间和关系网络——以王士祯为个案[J];北京社会科学;2009年04期
7 刘成群;鲍桐颐;;元儒陈栎的《尚书》学思想[J];宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
8 米文科;;薛敬之理学思想略论[J];宝鸡文理学院学报(社会科学版);2010年05期
9 王锷;清代甘肃文献的流传和启示[J];图书与情报;2003年06期
10 李帆;;科举考试与清代中期的理学[J];长白学刊;2006年05期
相关会议论文 前5条
1 辛德勇;;论所谓明铜活字印书于史初无征验——附论明代的金属活字印本[A];北京论坛(2008)文明的和谐与共同繁荣——文明的普遍价值和发展趋向:“传统与现代的国家建构与政治文化”历史分论坛论文或摘要集(下)[C];2008年
2 虞,
本文编号:2396088
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zggdslw/2396088.html