武则天入纪公案与“正统”论

发布时间：2019-01-18 11:50

【摘要】：是否将女皇武则天安放在《本纪》,史家争讼不已:德宗时期,沈既济上书《论则天不宜称本纪议》,声讨吴兢,公案肇起。然李唐基本上对则天保持"接纳"态势;自《旧唐书》开始,情感上的放逐已经彰显。范祖禹同司马光因此问题的决裂,表明放逐之声已占主流。公案的实质在于是否认可则天的帝王身份。而史家又在"实录"与"正统"的关系上出现了分歧:欧阳修在卫道的同时,还要考虑为当朝皇权寻找合法的依据,故采取既接纳又放逐的体例形式;范祖禹完全接受沈氏放逐则天的主张,批评实录只是纯粹纪实,不合"春秋之义",绝非"正统"。终唐之世能够接纳则天入纪,因为她挑战"正统"成功,终于被"正统"接纳。但她在征服"正统"的同时,却又回归"正统",此即"正统"力量下女人的宿命。
[Abstract]:Whether to place Queen Wu Zetian in "this Ji", historians argue: during the period of Dezong, Shen Zi-ji 's letter, "on heaven is not suitable for this discipline discussion", denouncing Wu Jing, starting the case. However, Li Tang basically maintains the situation of "accepting" the sky; since the Old Book of the Tang Dynasty, the emotional exile has been revealed. Fan Zuyu and Si Maguang so the break-off, indicating that the voice of exile has been the mainstream. The essence of the case is whether or not to accept the emperor's identity. However, historians have different views on the relationship between "Shi Lu" and "orthodoxy": Ouyang Xiu, while defending the Tao, has to consider looking for a legal basis for the imperial power of the court, so he adopts the style of accepting and banishing; Fan Zuyu completely accepted Shen's idea of banishment, and criticized the record as a pure record, which was not "orthodox" and not "the meaning of the Spring and Autumn period." The late Tang Dynasty was able to accept the days, because she challenged the "orthodoxy" success and was finally accepted by the "orthodoxy". But she conquest orthodoxy at the same time, but return to orthodoxy, which is the fate of women under the force of orthodoxy.
【作者单位】：河南科技大学人文学院;
【基金】：山东大学儒学高等研究院重大项目“儒学史论文献汇编暨中国古代史论研究”(编号12RWZD08) 河南省教育厅人文社科规划项目“社会大变局与隋唐五代历史思想研究”(编号2013 GH 083) 教育部人文社科规划基金项目“隋唐五代史论研究”(编号13YJAZH031)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：K242

【参考文献】