当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 中国通史论文 >

论“土木之变”前后明朝与朝鲜间的交涉

发布时间:2018-03-06 16:37

  本文选题:明朝 切入点:朝鲜 出处:《延边大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:明朝与朝鲜在立国之初确立了宗藩关系,两国关系的发展虽有波折,但大体上是友好的。朝鲜作为藩属国,对宗主国明朝十分重视,明朝亦将朝鲜视为来朝国家的典范。因此,当有重大事件发生时,双方都对彼此保持关注。明朝正统十四年(1449年)7月,蒙古瓦刺部大举南下进兵明境,明英宗朱祁镇在宦官王振的怂恿下,不顾群臣反对,御驾亲征。8月于土木堡被俘,史称"土木之变"。该事件的发生导致明朝政局发生重大变化,也引发了周边国家特别是朝鲜对此事的关注。本文试图在明朝发生"土木之变"这一事件的特殊背景下,围绕作为藩属国的朝鲜对上国情报的搜集情况及做出的一系列反应和对策,以及明朝对朝鲜的戒备与要求来考察明朝与朝鲜间的交涉,从而探讨特定时期明朝与朝鲜关系的实态。本论文共分为五章:第一章为绪论部分。本章节主要阐述了选题的研究目的、意义,国内外有关本论题的研究现状,以及选题的研究方法和创新点。第二章主要论述"土木之变"前明朝和朝鲜的内外局势。本章主要对"土木之变"前明朝和朝鲜的政治局势及两国的关系状况进行论述,是本文研究主题的历史背景。第三章主要分析朝鲜对蒙古瓦刺进犯明朝的反应。本章对蒙古瓦刺进犯明朝的情况、朝鲜对瓦刺进犯明朝情报收集活动进行论述,以此分析朝鲜在蒙古瓦刺进犯明朝战事伊始时做出的反应,并探讨由此映射出的明朝与朝鲜的关系状况。第四章主要探讨"土木之变"后明朝与朝鲜间的交涉。本章对明朝皇位更迭与朝鲜的反应、北京保卫战、景帝继位后与朝鲜关系进行论述,以此分析朝鲜对明朝"土木之变"后局势的关注,及朝鲜对明朝要求做出的反应。第五章为结论。通过对前文论述进行总结,得出论文的结论。
[Abstract]:The Ming Dynasty and the DPRK established the suzerain-vassal relationship at the beginning of their founding. Although the development of the relations between the two countries was twists and turns, the relations between the two countries were generally friendly. As a subordinate state, the DPRK attached great importance to the sovereign state of the Ming Dynasty, and the Ming Dynasty also regarded the DPRK as a model for coming to the DPRK. When there were major events, both sides remained concerned about each other. On July, the Mongolian Wasao Ministry entered the Ming Dynasty on a large scale southward in Ming Dynasty orthodoxy for 14 years (1449). Encouraged by the eunuch Wang Zhen, the town of Zhu Qi of the Ming Dynasty ignored the opposition of the ministers. In August, he was captured in a civil castle, known as "civil engineering change." this incident led to a major change in the political situation of the Ming Dynasty. It has also aroused the concern of neighboring countries, especially North Korea. This article attempts to take place in the special context of the "civil engineering change" in the Ming Dynasty. Focusing on the collection of intelligence and a series of responses and countermeasures made by the DPRK, as a subordinate state, as well as the vigilance and demands of the Ming Dynasty on the DPRK, it examines the negotiations between the Ming Dynasty and the DPRK. This paper is divided into five chapters: the first chapter is the introduction part. This chapter mainly describes the purpose, significance, domestic and foreign research status of this topic. The second chapter mainly discusses the internal and external situation of the Ming Dynasty and North Korea before the "civil engineering change". This chapter mainly discusses the political situation and the relationship between the two countries before the "civil engineering change". It is the historical background of this thesis. The third chapter mainly analyzes the reaction of North Korea to the attack of the Ming Dynasty by the Mongolian tile thorn. This chapter discusses the situation of the attack of the Mongolian tile thorn on the Ming Dynasty, and the intelligence gathering activities of the Ming Dynasty of the North Korea on the attack of the tile thorn. Based on this analysis of North Korea's reaction at the beginning of the war between the Ming Dynasty and Mongolia, Chapter 4th mainly discusses the negotiations between the Ming Dynasty and the DPRK after the "civil engineering change". This chapter deals with the reaction of the Ming Dynasty to the change of throne and the DPRK, and the Beijing Defense War. The relationship between King King and the DPRK was discussed in order to analyze North Korea's attention to the situation after the "civil engineering change" of the Ming Dynasty, and the DPRK's response to the requirements of the Ming Dynasty. Chapter 5th was the conclusion. Draw the conclusion of the paper.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:K248.2

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘能成;“土木之变”前明朝北方边防考略[J];贵阳金筑大学学报;2005年01期

2 孟修;;土木之变新论[J];黑龙江教育学院学报;2009年07期

3 李佳;;忠君与忠社稷关系辨——论明代土木之变中的士大夫政治价值观[J];求是学刊;2012年04期

4 王兆宁;;土木之变前后的士大夫[J];湖北第二师范学院学报;2013年01期

5 高春平;;郭登与土木之变[J];晋阳学刊;1993年04期

6 毛佩琦;;英宗·王振·土木之变[J];明史研究论丛;2007年00期

7 王大伟;慕三英;;明代“土木之变”对于处置战争背景下政治型人质事件的启示[J];中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版);2007年01期

8 吴云廷;土木之变前后的蒙古降人[J];河北学刊;1989年03期

9 曹永年;土木之变与也先称汗[J];内蒙古师大学报(哲学社会科学版);1991年01期

10 于默颖;;“土木之变”至隆庆和议前明朝对蒙古的消极固守应付政策[J];内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年06期

相关会议论文 前4条

1 毛佩琦;;英宗·王振·土木之变[A];明史研究论丛(第七辑)[C];2007年

2 孟修;;明蒙朝贡体制与土木之变[A];明代蓟镇文化学术研讨会论文集[C];2010年

3 孟修;;土木之变与庚戌之变比较研究——朝贡体制框架下的明蒙关系新探[A];《中国长城博物馆》2011年第2期[C];2012年

4 赵现海;;“土木之变”前后蒙古打通“阴山走廊”与进入河套[A];明史研究论丛(第十二辑)——明代国家与社会研究专辑[C];2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 张欣;论“土木之变”前后明朝与朝鲜间的交涉[D];延边大学;2017年

2 蒲章霞;“土木之变”若干问题探析[D];中央民族大学;2010年

3 孟修;土木之变与庚戌之变比较研究[D];黑龙江大学;2010年



本文编号:1575620

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/1575620.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6e0fb***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com