论苏洵的经史观及苏辙《春秋集解》的阐释特征

发布时间：2018-05-01 19:08

本文选题：苏洵 + 苏辙　；参考：《哲学研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：《春秋》的"经""史"性质问题是《春秋》学史上的重大议题,历代治经者对《春秋》经史性质的判定决定着《春秋》学的发展方向。先秦时期,《春秋》被列为"六经"之一,集经史于一体。从西汉董仲舒到晋代杜预再到宋初孙复,儒者往往将《春秋》的经史之性分裂为二,对其阐释也多采取扬此抑彼的做法。北宋时期,苏洵对经史问题作了深入的理论探讨,提出了经史"义一""体二"以及"用相资"的观点,从方法论上对传统的《春秋》学阐释思路作了重大改造。苏辙继承其父思想,他的《春秋集解》正是对苏洵经史观的实践之作。苏氏父子的经史观及其治经之法不仅对北宋时期《春秋》学逞意说经的弊端起到了纠正作用,也对后世经史观的发展产生了深远的影响。
[Abstract]:The issue of "Jing" and "history" in the spring and Autumn period is a major issue in the history of the spring and Autumn period, which determines the development direction of the spring and Autumn period. In the pre Qin period, the spring and Autumn period was listed as one of the six classics and integrated with the history of the six classics. From Dong Zhongshu in the Western Han Dynasty to the Jin Dynasty to the Song Chusun, the Confucian classics often took the spring and Autumn Period classics. In the Northern Song Dynasty, Su Xun made a deep theoretical discussion on the problems of history, put forward the viewpoint of "Yi 1", "body two" and "use phase capital" in the period of Northern Song Dynasty, and made a great transformation from the methodology to the traditional "spring and autumn study". He inherited his father thought and his "spring and autumn collection". It is the practice of Su Xun's view of history. The view of Su's father and son's Confucian classics and the method of treating classics not only correct the malpractice of the spring and Autumn period, but also have a profound influence on the development of the historical view of the later generations.

【作者单位】：嘉兴学院文法学院;
【分类号】：B244.99;K225.04

【相似文献】