当前位置:主页 > 社科论文 > 中国通史论文 >

王先谦《尚书孔传参正》研究

发布时间:2018-07-08 17:28

  本文选题:王先谦 + 《尚书孔传》 ; 参考:《湖南大学》2013年博士论文


【摘要】:《尚书孔传参正》是王先谦最重要的一部经学著作,他对清代汉学有关《尚书》的研究成果作了一次较为全面、系统的整理和总结,是一部集大成之作;同时他对前人的研究成果有补充和发挥,对前人的误漏有纠驳和疏正,他的经解和考据也有许多独到的见解和创获。故本文着重从二个方面入手研究,一方面对清代汉学有关《尚书》研究的基本情况作整体把握和比较研究,对其进行较为全面、系统的考察;另一方面对《尚书孔传参正》一书作了深入的解读和探讨,揭示其成就和价值,试图客观、公正地评判王先谦的学术成就及其历史地位。 本文主要分为六部分:第一部分论述《尚书孔传参正》的编纂体例及其对前人学术成果的汇辑。《参正》一书采用的是王先谦最擅长的集解或集注类体裁,体例完备,编排合理,,他将乾嘉汉学最擅长的各种治学方法熔于一炉,将前人,尤其自清初阎若璩至清末皮锡瑞几乎所有清代汉学大家有关《尚书孔传》的辨伪以及疏证今、古文的代表性成果网罗无遗。第二部分探讨王先谦对今、古文学术源流的梳理和考辨成就,主要从考正今文源流、梳理古文源流、厘清今、古文名实三个方面加以考察,并对他相关的学术观点,那些是他吸纳和整理前人的学术成果,那些是他本人的学术见识和考据所得,皆分别作了考辨。第三部分探讨王先谦对今、古文的汇辑和考证之功。明古、今,为学者提供一部最全面的汇辑《尚书》今、古文文字差异和义说分歧的著作,这是王先谦撰《参正》一书的主旨之一。不仅如此,王先谦对各家义说的高下短长还作出了考校和评判,虽有偏向今文的倾向,但大体还能不拘门户,实事求是。第四部分探讨王先谦对伪书、传的补证之功。《尚书孔传》经过明梅澾、清阎若璩等的辨伪以后,其伪书面目基本被揭露出来。但清代也还有不少学者在继续从事补充证伪的工作,颇有创获,王先谦是其中的代表人物之一。辨真伪,汇各家抉伪之说于一编,正是王先谦撰著《参正》一书的宗旨之一。本文主要从补证伪书二十五篇经文的剿袭造伪、抉发伪孔擅改经文之举二个方面揭示了王先谦对伪书、传经文的补充证伪之功;从揭露伪孔传剿袭之迹、求证伪孔传出于王肃说、揭发皇甫谧与王肃合谋作伪之迹三个方面揭示了他对伪孔传的补充证伪之功。第五部分探讨王先谦对《尚书·禹贡》的水地考证之功。王先谦的水地之学,不仅在于对相关的古代文献非常熟悉,而且还主张亲历实地,考古求证,这比那些纯粹考按志乘的纸上谈兵要高出一筹,所以,他有关《汉书·地理志》的补注和对《尚书·禹贡》的水地考证,可以说是中国古代水地之学的代表作品。第六部分探讨王先谦明古今、辨真伪之外的其他一些重要的经解和考据成就。《参正》博采旁搜,极为繁博,以至作者为数不少的按语往往是淹没在浩繁的旁征博引中,而为人所忽视。其实,他的按语有不少的部分系本人的独到见解,皆颇为精审。本文对妑部分内容进行了较为细致的梳理和挖掘,择其要者而给予了分析研究。
[Abstract]:"Kong Chuancan" is the most important book of Confucian classics of Wang Xianqian. He made a comprehensive, systematic review of the achievements of the Sinology of the Qing Dynasty, a systematic arrangement and summary. At the same time, he supplemented and exerted his predecessors' research results, refuting and correcting the mistakes of the predecessors, and his interpretation and textual criticism. There are also many unique views and creation. Therefore, this article focuses on two aspects, on the one hand, to make a comprehensive and systematic study of the basic situation of the Sinology of the Qing Dynasty about the Shang Shu research, and to make a thorough interpretation and Discussion on the book Kong Chuancan. And value, trying to objectively and impartially judge Wang Xianqian's academic achievements and historical status.
This article is divided into six parts: the first part discusses the compilation style of Kong Chuancan in Shang Shu and the compilation of his predecessors' academic achievements. At the beginning of the Qing Dynasty, the second parts of the Qing Dynasty and the late Qing Dynasty, almost all of the Han Scholars in the Qing Dynasty, related to the identification of the Confucian classics, and the representative achievements of the ancient Chinese literature. The second part discussed Wang Xianqian's academic origin of the present and ancient Chinese literature, which mainly from the origin of the present text, combing the origin of the ancient texts, clarifying the present and the ancient Chinese characters. In the third part, the third part discusses the collection and textual criticism of the present, the ancient prose and the present, to provide the most comprehensive collection of the book, the present, the present, It is one of the themes of Wang Xianqian's book Shen Zheng, which is one of the works of the difference of ancient Chinese characters and meaning. Not only that, Wang Xianqian has also made the examination and evaluation of the high and short length of each meaning, although there is a tendency towards the present text, but in the general, it can not take the portal and seek truth from facts. The fourth part discusses the contribution of Wang Xianqian to the false books. Wang Xianqian is one of the representative figures of the Qing Dynasty, which is one of the representative figures. One of the main purposes of this article is to reveal the false work of Wang Xianqian's false book and the passage of Scripture from the two aspects of the suppression and counterfeit of the twenty-five texts of the false books and the false holes, and to reveal the falsification of the perjury and the passage of the scriptures; and from the three aspects of exposing the false holes and suppression of the attacks, seeking the false holes to pass out from Wang Su, and revealing the traces of the emperor's tranquil and Wang Su's purge. The fifth part of his supplementary falsification of the false orifice. The fifth part discusses the merit of the water land examination of "Shang Shu Yu Gong >". Wang Qian's water field is not only very familiar with the related ancient literature, but also advocates to experience the field and the archaeological evidence, which is better than those who are purely on the paper. The supplement of the Han book, geography, and the textual research on the water and land of Shang Shu Yu Gong can be said to be the representative works of the ancient Chinese water and land studies. The sixth part discusses some other important achievements of interpretation and textual criticism of Wang Xianqian's Ming and the ancient and modern times and the identification of the true and false. In fact, there are many parts of his note, which are all my unique views.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:G256;K221.04

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 滕志贤;《诗三家义集疏》点校失误辨析[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2000年01期

2 孟伟;;王先谦骈文文论探析[J];船山学刊;2008年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 李明;王先谦《汉书补注》研究[D];南昌大学;2007年



本文编号:2108179

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2108179.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户d5f2d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com