王安石自作《讨交趾敕榜》说质疑

发布时间：2018-09-04 14:42

【摘要】：宋朝于熙宁八年十二月颁布的《讨交趾敕榜》,向来被认定为时任首相的王安石亲笔“自作”。但王安石自作《讨交趾敕榜》说最早与唯一的史源,只是王安石政敌司马光所作之《涑水记闻》,又显然与宋代内制皆由翰林学士等词臣草拟的制度不合。更为重要的是,榜文以彗星天变来咒诅交趾的核心内容,不仅与王安石“天变不足畏”的素来主张、“最不信《洪范》灾变之说”一以贯之的思想势若冰炭;特别是与其在当年十月末答宋神宗手诏札子当中,王安石具体所论的该次彗星等天变“不足信”完全rt牾。其实是司马光等旧党以讹传讹甚至有意编造出来的“谤言谤语”,目的在于丑化王安石,并非真为事实。《讨交趾敕榜》应是宋神宗本人授意词臣所作,当从王安石文集当中予以删除。
[Abstract]:Song Dynasty in Xining eight years in December promulgated the "Jiao Jiao Chi list", has always been regarded as the then Prime Minister Wang Anshi's own writing. However, Wang Anshi wrote the first and only historical source of the first and only source of history, which was written by Wang Anshi's political enemy Si Maguang, and it was obviously not in accordance with the system drafted by Hanlin and other ci ministers in the Song Dynasty. What is more important is that the core content of Bang Wen's curse is not only with Wang Anshi's "the days are not enough to be feared", but also with the consistent thought of "not believing in the theory of" Hongfan > catastrophe "." In particular, in his answer to Song Shenzong's handwritten edict at the end of October of that year, Wang Anshi's specific comment on the comet's "lack of faith" completely contradicted rt. In fact, it was the "slander and slander" of Si Maguang and other old parties that even deliberately fabricated it, whose purpose was to smear Wang Anshi. It is not true that it is true. "the list of Chi Jiao" should have been written by Song Shenzong himself. It should be deleted from Wang Anshi's collection.
【作者单位】：山东大学历史文化学院;

【相似文献】