嘉庆朝《文宗阁〈四库全书〉装函清册》考
发布时间：2018-11-22 11:20
【摘要】：通过比勘《文宗阁〈四库全书〉装函清册》与其他各阁书目及《四库全书总目》《四库全书简明目录》中书籍名称及类目排序的差别,可以判断《装函清册》并非伪作,并从《装函清册》著录的书籍、避讳和补函情况推测抄写于嘉庆时期。作为文宗阁《四库全书》的劫余之物,该清册具有极高的史料价值,将其与陈垣抄录的文津阁书籍函数进行比勘,发现两阁在书籍装函、合函等方面存在差异,可进行比较研究。
[Abstract]:By comparing the differences between the book titles and the sort of categories in the book catalogs of Wenzongge < Siku > and other cabinet bibliographies and the contents of < Sikuquan], we can judge that the catalogue of packing letters is not a false one. And from the book, taboo and supplementary letter presumably copied in Jiaqing period. As the robber of Wenzong Pavilion "Siku Guanshu", the inventory has very high historical material value. By comparing it with the Wenzinku's book function copied by Chen Yuan, it is found that there are differences between the two pavilions in the aspects of books, letters, and so on. A comparative study can be carried out.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学历史学院清史研究所;中国人民大学历史学院;
【基金】：“中国人民大学2016年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划”成果
【分类号】：K249.3
本文编号：2349202
[Abstract]:By comparing the differences between the book titles and the sort of categories in the book catalogs of Wenzongge < Siku > and other cabinet bibliographies and the contents of < Sikuquan], we can judge that the catalogue of packing letters is not a false one. And from the book, taboo and supplementary letter presumably copied in Jiaqing period. As the robber of Wenzong Pavilion "Siku Guanshu", the inventory has very high historical material value. By comparing it with the Wenzinku's book function copied by Chen Yuan, it is found that there are differences between the two pavilions in the aspects of books, letters, and so on. A comparative study can be carried out.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学历史学院清史研究所;中国人民大学历史学院;
【基金】：“中国人民大学2016年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划”成果
【分类号】：K249.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 张占生;;文津阁[J];紫禁城;1981年03期
2 别廷峰;乾隆御制碑文《文津阁记》[J];承德师专学报;1982年03期
，本文编号：2349202
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2349202.html
