论古史辨的评价及其相关问题——林甘泉先生访问记
发布时间：2019-08-15 08:20
【摘要】：解放以后对“古史辨”没有客观公正的评价 ,这与当时的政治气氛有关 ,但总的来说评价还是比较积极的。胡绳 195 7年说“古史辨”的“疑古精神是当时反封建思潮的一个侧面”,1993年又说顾颉刚是“马克思主义的朋友”,评价很高。“古史辨”在思想启蒙方面有积极意义 ,是思想解放的一个环节 ,这一点应该充分肯定。“古史辨”所受到的诟病是说它把古史砍掉几千年 ,这其实是误解。说它是“民族虚无主义”也不对。“古史辨”疑古所疑的主要是三皇五帝的古史系统 ,并不是对一切古史都怀疑。“古史辨”之前已有疑古 ,之后也应该有疑古精神。不能把信古、疑古、释古截然分开和绝对化 ,中国古代史研究也不是这三个阶段的问题。“走出疑古时代”的提法不合适。
[Abstract]:After liberation, there was no objective and fair evaluation of "ancient historical discrimination", which was related to the political atmosphere at that time, but generally speaking, the evaluation was relatively positive. In 1957, Hu Sheng said that the "spirit of suspicion of ancient history" was a side of the anti-feudal trend of thought at that time. In 1993, he also said that Gu Jiegang was a "friend of Marxism", which was highly appraised. The differentiation of ancient history is of positive significance in ideological enlightenment and is a link of ideological liberation, which should be fully affirmed. The criticism of Ancient History is that it cut down ancient history for thousands of years, which is in fact a misunderstanding. It is also wrong to say that it is "national nihilism". The ancient history differentiation is mainly the ancient history system of the three emperors and the five emperors, not all ancient history. There are doubts about antiquity before the differentiation of ancient history, and then there should also be the spirit of doubting antiquity. The study of ancient Chinese history is not the problem of these three stages, and the study of ancient Chinese history cannot be separated and absolute. The reference to "out of the ancient times" is not appropriate.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学法律古籍研究所
【分类号】：K207
本文编号：2526879
[Abstract]:After liberation, there was no objective and fair evaluation of "ancient historical discrimination", which was related to the political atmosphere at that time, but generally speaking, the evaluation was relatively positive. In 1957, Hu Sheng said that the "spirit of suspicion of ancient history" was a side of the anti-feudal trend of thought at that time. In 1993, he also said that Gu Jiegang was a "friend of Marxism", which was highly appraised. The differentiation of ancient history is of positive significance in ideological enlightenment and is a link of ideological liberation, which should be fully affirmed. The criticism of Ancient History is that it cut down ancient history for thousands of years, which is in fact a misunderstanding. It is also wrong to say that it is "national nihilism". The ancient history differentiation is mainly the ancient history system of the three emperors and the five emperors, not all ancient history. There are doubts about antiquity before the differentiation of ancient history, and then there should also be the spirit of doubting antiquity. The study of ancient Chinese history is not the problem of these three stages, and the study of ancient Chinese history cannot be separated and absolute. The reference to "out of the ancient times" is not appropriate.
【作者单位】： 中国政法大学法律古籍研究所
【分类号】：K207
【相似文献】
中国重要报纸全文数据库 前1条
1 张富祥;蒙文通与《古史甄微》[N];光明日报;2008年
，本文编号：2526879
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2526879.html
