家国之间:柏拉图与亚里士多德的家邦关系论述及其启示

发布时间：2018-02-28 00:21

本文关键词： 家庭国家差序格局公私关系公共性　出处：《中国社会科学》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：血缘既是人之自然情感的来源、家庭的纽带,又可能成为更大规模的社会组织如国家构成和运行的问题。检视作为西方思想和社会主要起点之一的柏拉图和亚里士多德思想中的相关论述,有助于中国社会学界对血缘在社会构成中的逻辑后果研究的深化。在柏拉图、亚里士多德关于家国关系的思想中,血缘被视为"友爱"这一人类普遍自然情感的根源,其内在的亲疏远近之区分在社会层面也得到一定关注;但这种自然情感会妨碍在城邦中构建普遍化的友爱关系,是德性和欲望、公和私、城邦和家对立的源头。因此,他们试图在制度层面消除或限制其作用领域,防止其对城邦目标和运行的破坏。这一社会构想,源于"双重自然"的理论预设。柏拉图和亚里士多德关于家国关系的想象对于现代西方的家国关系设计影响深远。
[Abstract]:The source of natural emotion is not only man's blood, family ties, and may become a social problem such as the national constitution and operation organization. As a larger view of Western thought and related discussion of the social main starting point of Platon and Aristotle thought, helps to deepen Chinese Social Research on the blood in the society constitute the logical consequences in. In Platon, Aristotle on the national relations thought, blood is regarded as a "source of love" the universal human nature of emotion, the closeness of the distinction in the social level has also been a concern; but this will hinder the construction of universal natural emotion friendly relations in the city is. Virtue and desire, public and private, the source of city and home opposition. Therefore, they are trying to eliminate or restrict the effect of system level, to prevent the target and operation of the broken city Bad. This social conception originates from the theoretical presupposition of "dual nature". Platon and Aristotle's imagination about the relationship between family and family has far-reaching influence on the design of modern western family relationship.

【作者单位】：上海大学社会学院;
【分类号】：D091

【相似文献】