从自然法到契约论——兼评施特劳斯的正义理论

发布时间：2018-04-23 18:12

本文选题：价值论研究 + 正义观念　；参考：《哲学研究》2013年11期

【摘要】：正近年来,随着我国社会转型的深入、阶层分化的剧烈,正义问题成为学术界关注的热点之一。对于该问题的研究,许多学者从新自由主义、分析的马克思主义乃至新儒家等不同理论背景出发,在各自领域都取得了不俗的成就。但从总体上看,这些研究较少能坚持逻辑与历史的统一,彼此欠缺"了解之同情",从而妨碍了对问题进行更深刻的、富有建设性的思考。比如,不少研究者支持罗尔斯所谓"正义是社会制度的首要价值"的观点,但其研究未能借鉴当代价值论研究的方法与成果;有些研究者在古典正义观和现代正义观之间随意取舍,却不曾进入政治哲学史语境,批判地审视正义观从古到今的基本演变轨迹。有鉴于此,本文尝试将价值论研究和政治哲学史研究结合起来,以列奥·施特劳斯在《自然权利和历史》中提出的问题为线索,辩证地揭示正义的本质。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the deepening of social transformation and the sharp division of stratum, justice has become one of the hot topics in academic circles. For the study of this issue, many scholars have made great achievements in their respective fields from different theoretical backgrounds such as neoliberalism, analysis of Marxism and even neo-Confucianism. On the whole, however, these studies are less able to adhere to the unity of logic and history, and lack "understanding sympathy" between each other, thus hindering more profound and constructive thinking about the problem. For example, many researchers support Rawls's view that "justice is the primary value of social system", but its research fails to draw lessons from the methods and achievements of contemporary axiological research. Some researchers choose between classical and modern views of justice at will, but never enter the context of political philosophy, critically examine the basic evolution of the view of justice from ancient to present. In view of this, this paper attempts to combine the study of axiology with the study of the history of political philosophy, taking the question raised by Leo Strauss in "Natural Rights and History" as the clue to reveal dialectically the essence of justice.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学人文学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“人生哲学的当代建构研究”(编号2009JJD720011) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“詹姆逊与马克思主义文化批判理论”(编号12YJC720022) 中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队项目“人文精神与当代文化研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D091

【共引文献】