回到葛兰西:重启领导权的政治性

发布时间：2018-04-25 17:08

本文选题：葛兰西 + 领导权　；参考：《马克思主义与现实》2017年05期

【摘要】：葛兰西的领导权概念,是列宁主义与20世纪二三十年代意大利独特的历史语境结合的产物。但中文世界今天所理解的"领导权",并不是葛兰西意义上的领导权(egemonia),而是经英国文化研究转译而来的"文化领导权"(hegemony)。经过转译,这个概念被打上了文化主义的烙印,而其原本具有的丰富的政治内涵却被无形遮蔽了。回到这个概念诞生的语境,我们会发现,领导权是葛兰西在意大利革命遭遇南北不平衡发展、天主教、阶级政党及民族国家等一系列问题时提出的概念,它是政党将农民阶级和无产阶级联盟构造为民族一人民这样一个政治主体的关键环节,这个环节包括了知识、道德、政治、经济等诸多因素,而知识和道德本身也是作为政治问题提出来的。因此,如何将领导权概念再政治化成为了我们今天面临的问题。通过这个概念具有的"民族—人民"内涵,我们或许可以找到重启其政治性的途径。
[Abstract]:Gramsci's concept of leadership is the result of the combination of Leninism and the unique historical context of Italy in the 1920s and 1930s. But what the Chinese world understands today as "leadership" is not the leadership in the sense of Gramsci, but rather the "cultural leadership" translated by British cultural studies. After translation, the concept was branded with the brand of culturalism, but its rich political connotations were obscured by the invisible. Going back to the context of the birth of this concept, we will find that leadership is the concept put forward by Gramsci when he encountered a series of problems in the Italian revolution, such as the unbalanced development of the north and the south, Catholicism, class parties, and nation-states. It is the key link for political parties to construct the alliance of the peasant class and the proletariat as such a political subject as a nation and a people. This link includes many factors, such as knowledge, morality, politics, economy, and so on. Knowledge and morality themselves are raised as political issues. Therefore, how to re-politicize the concept of leadership has become a problem we face today. Through the concept of "nation-people" connotation, we may find a way to relaunch its political.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学思勉人文高等研究院;
【分类号】：D091

【相似文献】