正义原则的证明问题

发布时间：2018-05-12 22:43

  本文选题：罗尔斯 + 正义原则　； 参考：《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：罗尔斯假定,在原初状态下,自由平等的道德-理性人置身于无知之幕背后,经过广泛的协调讨论,做出理性选择,把公平正义接受为最合理的实质性正义原则,于是正义原则得到了确立。针对这一证明策略,批评者质疑正义原则的真实性和有效性,质疑两个正义原则的兼容性,批评差别原则的模糊性及其调节对象社会基本益品的任意性。原始契约不是真契约,公平正义观只是一种个人主张,不具有权威性。罗尔斯把有待证明的原则当作绝对命令,导致正义原则的“证明/接受悖谬”。正义原则证明在政治哲学中占据着核心位置。考察正义原则的证明问题,探索正义原则证明的政治学或经济学路径,推进罗尔斯之后的正义理论研究,是当前政治哲学的重要任务。从哲学证明走向科学证明,是正义原则证明的新方向,跨学科研究将为这个新方向提供可能性。
[Abstract]:Rawls assumed that, under the original state, the free and equal moral rational person was placed behind the curtain of ignorance, after extensive coordination discussion, made rational choice, accepted justice as the most reasonable principle of substantive justice, so the principle of justice was established. And validity, question the compatibility of the two principles of justice, the fuzziness of the principle of criticizing the difference principle and the arbitrariness of the basic social benefits of regulating the object. The original contract is not a true contract, the view of fairness and justice is only a personal claim, and it is not authoritative. Rawls regards the original principle as the absolute order, which leads to the "proof /" of the principle of justice. The principle of justice proves that it occupies a core position in the political philosophy. It is an important task for the current political philosophy to study the proof of the principle of justice, explore the political or economic path proved by the principle of justice, and promote the research of the theory of justice after Rawls. Interdisciplinary research will provide new directions for this new direction.

，

本文编号：1880467