评普列汉诺夫《无政府主义和社会主义》

发布时间：2018-05-23 07:11

本文选题：普列汉诺夫 + 无政府主义和社会主义　；参考：《南京政治学院学报》2017年01期

【摘要】：普列汉诺夫《无政府主义和社会主义》这本小册子,不仅在其诞生的时代具有迫切的实践意义,在理论上也有相当的价值。在这本小册子中,作者根据马克思恩格斯唯物史观基本原则,第一次系统而全面地分析批判了无政府主义的理论和策略,使其成为批判无政府主义理论的最高点和代表作。《无政府主义和社会主义》不仅批判了无政府主义主要代表的"政治哲学",而且还正确地批判了无政府主义者的经济理论和经济纲领。《无政府主义和社会主义》当然也有自己的缺点错误,这主要就是"回避了整个国家问题",即它没有"理会马克思主义在公社以前和以后的全部发展",特别是没有理会马克思和恩格斯在1871、1872和1875年关于国家问题的论述。只有根据列宁从早期到晚期对无政府主义的全部批判,才能正确评价普列汉诺夫这本小册子的所短和所长、价值和糟糠。
[Abstract]:The pamphlet "Anarchism and Socialism" by Plekhanov is not only of urgent practical significance in the era of its birth, but also of considerable value in theory. In this booklet, the author, for the first time, systematically and comprehensively analyzes and criticizes the theory and strategy of anarchism according to the basic principles of Marx and Engels' historical materialism. "Anarchism and Socialism" not only criticizes the "political philosophy" of the main representative of anarchism, but also correctly criticizes the anarchist's "political philosophy". Economic theory and economic programs. Anarchism and Socialism, of course, have their own shortcomings and mistakes. This mainly means that it "evaded the whole national problem", that is, it did not "pay attention to the whole development of Marxism before and after the commune", especially the exposition of Marx and Engels on the state problem in 1871 / 1872 and 1875. Only on the basis of Lenin's complete criticism of anarchism from the early to the late, can we correctly evaluate the short and strong points, the value and the bad bran of Plainov's pamphlet.
【作者单位】：南京政治学院;
【分类号】：D091

【相似文献】