考察“后工业社会”概念的多种理解

发布时间：2018-05-25 09:59

本文选题：工业社会 + 后工业社会　；参考：《理论探讨》2013年05期

【摘要】：在人文社会科学的叙事中,后工业社会的概念得到越来越多的使用。然而,对于这一概念的使用却存在着巨大的差异。贝尔是基于产业的角度来定义后工业社会的概念的,他认为,当服务业取代了工业而占主导地位时,就意味着后工业社会的来临。贝尔所提出的这一判定标准有着广泛的影响,绝大多数学者都是从此出发去定义后工业社会的概念,即使有所不同,也是通过进一步举例的方式去丰富贝尔的理解,或者为后工业社会增加一些新的特征(如信息)。但是,在把后工业社会与人类历史发展阶段相印证时,却存在着很大的差别,如德鲁克甚至认为二战后就是后工业社会的完成阶段,并进入了一个新的所谓"知识社会"的阶段。所有这些谈论后工业社会的学者都忽视了人际关系、社会治理方式及其制度方面的状况。
[Abstract]:In the narrative of humanities and social sciences, the concept of post-industrial society has been used more and more. However, there are great differences in the use of this concept. Bell defines the concept of post-industrial society from the perspective of industry. He believes that when service industry takes the lead in replacing industry, it means the coming of post-industrial society. This criterion put forward by Bell has a wide influence. Most scholars begin to define the concept of post-industrial society from this point of view. Even if it is different, it is through further examples to enrich Bell's understanding. Or add some new features (such as information) to the post-industrial society. However, there are great differences between post-industrial society and the stage of development of human history. For example, Drucker even thinks that post-industrial society is the completion stage of post-industrial society after World War II. And entered a new stage of the so-called "knowledge society". All of these postindustrial scholars ignore relationships, social governance and their systems.
【作者单位】：南京大学政府管理学院;
【基金】：江苏服务型政府建设研究基地(南京理工大学)开放基金项目资助江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(CXZZ12-0072)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D035

【参考文献】