丁文江与胡适的政治思想比较研究

发布时间：2018-11-16 08:07

【摘要】：胡适和丁文江二人是近代中国历史上知名的学者，丁文江是中国最早的地质教学机构和地质研究机构的创建者，是中国近代地质学界的开山人物，胡适则是新文化运动的领袖。丁、胡二人虽不是政治家，但都一生关心政治，议论政治，丁文江并有投身政治的实践活动。二人有共同的自由主义思想基础，但在具体的政治问题上，却有同有异，，反应出中国自由主义的多样面相，对二人思想做比较的研究，一方面可以加深对丁文江、胡适思想的认识，同时更有助于我们加深对1920年代和1930年代的中国自由主义的认识。全文第一部分是引言，概括介绍丁文江与胡适二人的思想背景、思想交往。介绍与文章论题的研究意义、研究现状及研究方法。第一章围绕“好人政府”问题，介绍丁文江与胡适展开的讨论及实践。1922年二人创办的《努力》周报，议论时政，他们共同关注的问题就是改造中国走什么道路的问题，围绕好人政府，《努力》周报进行了讨论，丁、胡二人对“好人”当政模式下的政府性质、政府组织原则、好政府党的建立与否等问题上进行了讨论，丁文江并以出任“淞沪督办”总办做了一个好人从政的尝试。第二章主要讨论丁文江与胡适在日本侵华后，对国共内战与抗日问题的讨论。在日本侵华的大背景下，他们都坚决反对国民党进行反共内战，但是对待日本的态度，却存在一个由低调妥协到积极抗战的变化过程。第三章主要讨论在1930年代著名的“民主与独裁大讨论”中，丁文江和胡适的观点，讨论胡适提倡“幼稚民主论”，丁文江主张的威权主义的“新式独裁”的区别。第四章是在前三部分的基础之上，尝试解析丁文江与胡适在政治思想上存在这些同异的原因。全文的最后一部分是结语。对全文的观点做一个简单的总结。
[Abstract]:Hu Shi and Ding Wenjiang are two famous scholars in modern Chinese history. Ding Wenjiang is the founder of the earliest geological teaching institution and geological research institution in China. Ding and Hu are not politicians, but they care about politics and discuss politics all their lives. The two men share the same ideological basis for liberalism, but on specific political issues, there are similarities and differences, reflecting the diverse aspects of Chinese liberalism. A comparative study of the two people's thoughts can, on the one hand, deepen Ding Wenjiang. Hu Shi's understanding of Chinese liberalism in 1920s and 1930s is also helpful for us to deepen our understanding of Chinese liberalism in 1920s and 1930s. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the ideological background and communication between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi. This paper introduces the research significance, research status and research methods of the thesis. The first chapter focuses on the issue of "good government" and introduces the discussion and practice between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi. In 1922, the "hard work" weekly newspaper was founded by the two men to discuss the current politics. Their common concern was the question of what path to take in reforming China. The "hard work" Weekly newspaper was discussed around the good people's government. Ding and Hu discussed the nature of the government under the "good man" model, the principles of government organization, the establishment of the good government party, and so on. Ding Wenjiang also made a good attempt to take part in politics by acting as head office of "Songhu Supervision Office". The second chapter mainly discusses the civil war and anti-Japanese issues between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi after the Japanese invasion of China. Against the backdrop of Japanese aggression against China, they were firmly opposed to the KMT's anti-Communist civil war, but there was a process of change from low-key compromise to active resistance to Japan. The third chapter mainly discusses the views of Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi in the famous Great discussion on Democracy and dictatorship in the 1930s, and discusses the difference between "childish democracy" advocated by Hu Shi and "new autocracy" advocated by Ding Wenjiang. The fourth chapter is based on the first three parts, trying to analyze the reasons for the similarities and differences between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi in political thought. The last part of the paper is the conclusion. Make a simple summary of the views of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D092

【参考文献】