略谈马列主义的封建观和社会形态观

发布时间：2018-04-28 21:29

本文选题：马克思主义 + 社会经济形态　；参考：《史学月刊》2008年03期

【摘要】：中日译者以中国故有的"封建"概念,对译西语中表述西欧中世纪社会制度的feudalismus一词,后来在中国将秦汉以后至明清时期的历史称为"封建社会"。此说在中国近代社会及学术界形成主流认识。然而,中国秦汉以后至明清时期的历史是不是类似西欧中世纪的社会形态,中国的这段历史应该不应该有自己的特殊性表达,长期以来一直是学界有所关注的问题。冯天瑜教授《"封建"考论》一书的出版,再次将这个问题的讨论推向了高潮。两年来,关于封建译名以及如何认识马克思主义封建观的讨论,不断见诸报端,并形成了尖锐对立的不同意见。本刊认为,这场讨论,从"封建"译名引申到学术概念的界定,更进一步深入到中国封建社会的再认识,不仅关系到如何以科学的态度对待马克思主义理论的指导问题,更关系着我们对中国秦汉以后社会性质的判断,关系重大,意义深远。所以,本刊决定以笔谈的形式参与这场讨论,并欢迎学界同仁热情赐稿。
[Abstract]:Using the concept of feudalism, Chinese and Japanese translators translate the term feudalismus, which describes the medieval social system of Western Europe in the western language, and later refers to the history of the Qin and Han dynasties to the Ming and Qing dynasties as "feudal society" in China. This theory formed a mainstream understanding in modern Chinese society and academia. However, the history of China from the Qin and Han dynasties to the Ming and Qing dynasties is similar to the social formation of the Middle Ages in Western Europe. The history of China should not have its own special expression, which has long been the concern of academic circles. The publication of Professor Feng Tianyu's book "feudal examination" once again brought the discussion to a climax. Over the past two years, discussions on the translation of feudal names and how to understand Marxist feudal views have been published in newspapers and formed sharply opposed opinions. This magazine believes that this discussion, extending from the translation of the name "feudalism" to the definition of academic concepts and further deepening into the re-understanding of the feudal society in China, is not only related to the guidance of how to treat Marxist theory in a scientific manner. More related to our judgment of the social nature of the Qin and Han dynasties, it is of great importance and far-reaching significance. Therefore, the journal decided to participate in the discussion in written form, and welcomed the enthusiasm of the academic community contributions.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院经济研究所
【分类号】：K207

【相似文献】