历史语境中的王朝中国疆域概念辨析——以天下、四海、中国、疆域、版图为例

发布时间：2018-06-04 00:07

  本文选题：王朝中国 + 王权　； 参考：《中国边疆史地研究》2006年02期

【摘要】：作为国家理念的体现,疆域概念产生于具体的历史语境。由于古今中国国家性质不同,王朝中国的疆域概念与现代中国主权、领土不能用简单的继承或对接来解释。在王权泛化或王权至上观念的影响下,王朝中国的疆域话语尽管受到地理知识限制,但仍坚持认为在可知范围内,王朝中国天子有权实行统治。这种深受王朝国家理念影响的疆域话语对古代疆域概念产生了很大影响。以常见的5个古代中国疆域概念为例,“天下”有广狭二义,一是普天之下,一是华夏诸国;“四海”即四方,有时包括四夷,有时不包括;“中国”概念迭加变化整合,各朝“中国”范围不尽相同;“疆域”是一国统治范围的宣示;“版图”则是王朝国家行政地区。本文通过追溯原本词义,认为上述概念原意与后世借用,因语境变化,语义发生差异;进而提出,学术用语与习惯说法应有区别,这不仅是运用概念准确与否的问题,而且也涉及研究价值的取向。
[Abstract]:As the embodiment of national concept, the concept of territory comes from the specific historical context. Because of the different nature of ancient and modern China, the concept of the territory of dynasty China and modern Chinese sovereignty, the territory can not be simply inherited or docked to explain. Under the influence of the concept of Wang Quan generalization or Wang Quan supremacy, although the territorial discourse of dynasty China is limited by geographical knowledge, it still insists that, within the scope of knowability, the emperor of dynasty China has the right to rule. This kind of territory discourse, which was deeply influenced by the concept of dynastic state, had a great influence on the concept of ancient territory. Take five common concepts of ancient Chinese territory as an example, "the world" has broad and narrow meanings, one is the whole world and the other is the Chinese countries; the "four seas" are four directions, sometimes including the four barbarians, and sometimes not; the concept of "China" is superseded by changes and integration. The scope of "China" of each dynasty is different; "territory" is the declaration of the scope of a country's rule; "territory" is the administrative region of the dynasty. By tracing back the original meaning of the word, this paper holds that the meaning of the above concept is different from that of later generations because of the change of context, and then points out that there should be differences between academic terms and idioms, which is not only a question of whether the concept is accurate or not. It also involves the orientation of research value.
【作者单位】： 中国社会科学院中国边疆史地研究中心
【分类号】：K207
，

本文编号：1974856