对闽南文化形成期的几点看法
发布时间：2018-07-27 12:24
【摘要】：闽南文化的形成期是闽南文化研究中十分重要的理论问题。在八闽文化中,闽南文化是影响最大、分布最广、人口数量最多的一支独特类型的民系文化。闽南文化应早于闽东文化,在唐代已经形成,它的奠基者即为唐初率领中原移民入闽的陈政、陈元光父子。然而,数十年来在闽南文化研究中,由于"疑古"思潮的影响,研究者所采用的方法进行研究,得出不能令人信服的结论,在一定程度上影响了对形成期的正确认识,并低估了唐代初年对泉潮地区开发所带来的巨大成就,以及对形成闽南文化的重要作用。
[Abstract]:The forming period of Minnan culture is a very important theoretical problem in the study of Minnan culture. In the eight Fujian culture, Minnan culture is the most influential, the most widely distributed, the largest population of a unique type of ethnic culture. Minnan culture should be earlier than the culture of eastern Fujian, and has been formed in the Tang Dynasty. Its founder was Chen Zheng, who led the Central Plains immigrants to Fujian in the early Tang Dynasty, and Chen Yuanguang's father and son. However, due to the influence of the trend of thought of "doubting the ancients" in the cultural studies of southern Fujian in the past decades, the methods used by the researchers have been studied, and the unconvincing conclusions have been drawn, which to some extent have affected the correct understanding of the forming period. It also underestimates the great achievements brought by the development of spring tide area in the early Tang Dynasty and its important role in the formation of Minnan culture.
【作者单位】： 漳州师范学院闽台文化研究所
【分类号】：K203
[Abstract]:The forming period of Minnan culture is a very important theoretical problem in the study of Minnan culture. In the eight Fujian culture, Minnan culture is the most influential, the most widely distributed, the largest population of a unique type of ethnic culture. Minnan culture should be earlier than the culture of eastern Fujian, and has been formed in the Tang Dynasty. Its founder was Chen Zheng, who led the Central Plains immigrants to Fujian in the early Tang Dynasty, and Chen Yuanguang's father and son. However, due to the influence of the trend of thought of "doubting the ancients" in the cultural studies of southern Fujian in the past decades, the methods used by the researchers have been studied, and the unconvincing conclusions have been drawn, which to some extent have affected the correct understanding of the forming period. It also underestimates the great achievements brought by the development of spring tide area in the early Tang Dynasty and its important role in the formation of Minnan culture.
【作者单位】： 漳州师范学院闽台文化研究所
【分类号】：K203
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭利霞;侯瑞芬;;山阴地名的文化语言学分析[J];北京教育学院学报;2005年04期
2 黄薇;;明清几本闽语韵书的亲疏关系——以韵类的差异性为例[J];毕节学院学报;2009年07期
3 陈嘉莉;;海峡两岸闽南方言的形成和异同[J];今传媒;2010年10期
4 陈恒汉;;闽南方言“流浪记”:以词汇输出为证[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2011年06期
5 李春晓;福州方言韵书《加订美全八音》[J];辞书研究;2003年04期
6 黄金洪;;闽语仙游话特色词初探[J];辽东学院学报(社会科学版);2008年03期
7 陈梓生;;闽南方言的文化特性[J];东南传播;2007年12期
8 曾金霖;从闽台方言看闽台文化的共同内涵[J];福建广播电视大学学报;2004年06期
9 陈恒汉;英语与闽南话词汇互借的跨文化研究[J];福建外语;2000年03期
10 陆招英;张平忠;;古时福建的开发及方言底层词[J];福建教育学院学报;2008年10期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 王荣国;;兴化区域文化形成初探[A];莆仙文化研究——首届莆仙文化学术研讨会论文集[C];2002年
2 郭锦飙;;闽南方言与闽南文化议略[A];论闽南文化：第三届闽南文化学术研讨会论文集（上）[C];2005年
3 朱Z瀂，
本文编号：2147818
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shekelunwen/zhongguolishiwenhua/2147818.html
