寂护正名研究

发布时间：2018-02-16 00:33

本文关键词： 寂护正名文献归属　出处：《西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：寂护在藏文史籍中出现有多个异名,不同时代的藏文典籍提到寂护时通常会有几个异名同时出现。加之绵长的历史,以及佛教生命观对史学观的影响,寂护的异名问题越来越显著,先后引起宗喀巴和多罗那他的注意,但均未给予充分的解答。由于现代学术研究的严谨性要求,对寂护异名进行考证,一方面关涉到寂护相关研究的合法性,另一方面关涉到寂护异名著作的归属问题,具有一定的文献学意义。通过研究,将寂护署名著作进行了比较全面的厘清。
[Abstract]:There are many synonyms in Tibetan history books, and several synonyms usually appear in different Tibetan classics when they are mentioned in different times. In addition, the long history and the influence of the Buddhist view of life on the view of history, The problem of synonymy of silent nursing has become more and more obvious, which has attracted the attention of Zongkaba and Doronat successively, but neither of them has given sufficient answers. Due to the rigorous requirements of modern academic research, the synonyms of silence and protection have been studied and verified. On the one hand, it is concerned with the legitimacy of the research on silence and nursing, on the other hand, it concerns the attribution of the synonymous works of silence and protection, which has a certain philological significance. Through the study, the author clarifies the works of silence and protection in a more comprehensive way.
【作者单位】：华东师范大学哲学系;
【基金】：2012年国家民委项目“理论与信仰的重构:宗喀巴中观思想的哲学诠释”(项目编号:12XZZ010)
【分类号】：B948

【相似文献】