詹森派视野中的“利玛窦规矩”——以《耶稣会士的实用伦理学》第二卷为中心

发布时间：2018-03-03 15:47

本文选题：詹森主义　切入点：利玛窦规矩　出处：《浙江社会科学》2013年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文以法国詹森主义者康布·德·本特夏托(Sebastien-Joseph du Cambout de Coislin de Pontchateau)批判耶稣会在华传教策略的论争文献——《耶稣会士的实用伦理学》第二卷——为研究个案,指出耶稣会在欧洲的敌对力量——詹森主义(jansenism)——对"利玛窦规矩"所持的批评态度和立场。文本资料上,詹森主义者详尽掌握着1652年以前欧洲有关中国礼仪之争的材料;价值立场上,他们更加认同多明我会士和方济各会士的传教方式。詹森主义者对中国礼仪和耶稣会在华传教策略的贬抑和排斥根源上是由于双方在神学理论和伦理学体系上的差异决定的。但詹森主义者用以衡量、评判耶稣会在华传教策略的严格主义(Rigorism)道德立场在17、18世纪清教主义盛行的法国社会和奉行教会自主原则(Gallicanism)的法兰西教会内赢得了为数众多的支持者,使詹森派在与耶稣会的争论中在舆论上获得了极大的成功、产生了很大的影响,而詹森主义者对"利玛窦规矩"的批评态度反过来也助长了法兰西教会对耶稣会一直抱持的敌对态度。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author takes Sebastien-Joseph du Cambout de Coislin de Pontchateaua, a Jansenist from France, as a case study, criticizing Jesuits' missionary strategy in China-"practical Ethics of the Jesuits", vol. 2. The author points out the critical attitude and position of Jesuit's rival force in Europe, Jansenism- towards the "Matteo Ricci Rule". In the text, the Jansenists have a detailed grasp of the materials of the European debate on Chinese etiquette before 1652; In terms of value, They agree more with the Dominican and Franciscan missionary ways. The disparagement and rejection of Chinese etiquette and Jesuits' missionary strategies in China are rooted in the theological theories and ethical systems of both sides. Difference. But the Jansenists measure it, The strict Rigorism moral stance, which judges the Jesuits' missionary strategy in China, has won a large number of supporters in the 17th-century puritanist French society and in the French Church, which adheres to the principle of ecclesiastical autonomy, Gallicanism. That made the Jansenists a great success in public opinion in their argument with the Jesuits, and had a great impact on it. Jason's criticism of Matteo Ricci, in turn, encouraged the French church to be hostile to the Jesuits.
【作者单位】：中共浙江省委党校社会学文化学教研部;
【基金】：浙江省社联课题“明末清初中西文化双向互动研究” 杭州市规划课题“耶稣会决疑论与儒家经权说比较研究”(B12WH07)
【分类号】：B978

【参考文献】