继续改革中:从“自然的神学”到“自然神学”

发布时间：2018-03-25 16:15

本文选题：宗教改革　切入点：拯救论　出处：《探索与争鸣》2017年09期

【摘要】：自宗教改革以来,基督新教神学关于自然神学形成了赞同、反对、适度包容三种立场,始终面对一个张力:一方面追求福音使命,把神学焦点集中在"拯救"而凸显福音真理的特殊性,倾向反对自然神学;另一方面追求知性任务,把神学焦点集中在"创造"而寻求宇宙真理的普遍性,倾向支持自然神学。这个张力座落在支持自然神学的真理普遍法则与反对自然神学的信仰自我描述之间。在一个热切期待改革的时代,人们若是缺乏"创造理念"的话,很可能成为勘天役物的征服者却制造各种生态危机;人们若是缺乏"终末盼望"的话,很可能因缺乏方向而盲目地在许多尝试与错误之间打转。关键之处在于,拯救论与创造论连结之必要,传统上对于自然神学的疑虑——担心失去身份认同的问题,可以借由拯救论作为创造论的未来、创造论作为拯救论的源头,以上帝国视野以及终末论架构最终化解。
[Abstract]:Since the Reformation, Protestant theology has formed three positions of approval, opposition and moderate tolerance on natural theology, and has always faced a tension: on the one hand, it pursues the gospel mission. The theology focuses on "salvation" and highlights the particularity of the gospel truth, and tends to oppose natural theology; on the other hand, it pursues the task of understanding and focuses on "creation" to seek the universality of the truth of the universe. A tendency to support natural theology. This tension lies between the universal law of truth that supports natural theology and the belief in self-description against natural theology. In an era of fervent desire for reform, people lack "creative ideas," It is possible to become a conqueror of heavenly objects but to create ecological crises; if one lacks "final hope", one is likely to blindly spin between many attempts and mistakes because of a lack of direction. The key point is that, The necessity of linking salvation with creationism, and the traditional doubts about natural theology-concerns about the loss of identity can be used as the future of creationism and creationism as the source of salvation. The above imperial vision and the final theory of the structure of the final solution.
【作者单位】：台湾神学研究学院;台湾神学研究学院基督教思想研究中心;
【分类号】：B979

【相似文献】