李筌和袁淑真《阴符经》注疏关系考辨

发布时间：2018-04-02 09:19

本文选题：刘师培　切入点：骊山老母　出处：《宗教学研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：作者不同意学术界长期流行的见解,认为《正统道藏》署名李筌的《黄帝阴符经疏》不是抄袭署名袁淑真的《黄帝阴符经集解》。通过考察两个注本的传抄失误和有意改写,可知这些差异不能支持流行见解。而相关目录资料显示李筌本的记录比较早,袁淑真本的记录是南宋初年,袁淑真的署名则值得进一步考察。论文注意到骊山老母神话的影响和《阴符经》注本的复杂性,这两个本子来源于同一个祖本,且都经过修改。今天我们看到的远非原始面貌,但是还保留着珍贵的信息,其章末结语和附录经注都证明这两个本子经过多次改动。
[Abstract]:The author does not agree with the long-popular view in academic circles that the signature of Li Quan's "Huang Di Yin Fu Jing Shu" is not a plagiarism of the signature Yuan Shu-zhen < Yellow Emperor Yin Fu Jing Ji Jie >.By examining the transmission errors and intentional rewriting of the two notes, we can see that these differences do not support the popular view.The relevant catalog data show that Li Quben recorded earlier, Yuan Shuzhen recorded in the early years of the Southern Song Dynasty, Yuan Shuzhen signed the name is worthy of further investigation.This paper pays attention to the influence of the old mother myth of Lishan and the complexity of the annotated version of the Yin Fu Jing. These two books are from the same ancestor and both have been modified.What we see today is far from original, but it retains valuable information, both of which are proved to have been altered many times by the end of the chapter and the notes to the appendix.
【作者单位】：北京大学哲学系;
【分类号】：B952

【相似文献】