重审耶佛对话的两种模式

发布时间：2018-07-05 08:31

本文选题：耶佛对话 + 多重文化参与　；参考：《清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：宗教学家威尔弗瑞德·史密斯认为,信仰乃是基本的宗教范畴,其实质就是一种"参与"。从耶佛对话的角度看,基督教入华后分别采取了"辟佛—易佛""况佛—援佛"等文化参与模式。其中晚明天主教徒立足于实践和礼仪层面来展开"辟佛"和"易佛",但却错失了"性理之学"层面上与佛教思想熔铸的历史机遇。谢扶雅等现代基督徒学人提出的"基督学时代论"则是立足于佛学深度中国化的历史经验、从而具有史家视野的文化参与立场。时代论历史视野透露出一种可能性,即基督教与佛教在性理之学层面上具有深度会通的思想基础。得益于唐代开放的文化政策,景教采取了深度中国化的路线。以景净为代表的唐代景士在性理之学的"援佛入景"方面做了很多尝试,留下了宝贵的历史经验。过去学者常常批评景教过度迎合本土文化,而未能看到景教超越格义、实现思想的创造性熔铸的积极意义。当年王国维以史家的敏锐眼光,视景教敦煌文书为"世界宝籍",其着眼点恐怕就在于强调汉语景教文献的文化策略意义,不能不引起重视。
[Abstract]:Religious scientist Wilfred Smith believes that faith is a basic religious category, and its essence is a kind of participation. From the point of view of the dialogue of Yephav, Christianity adopted the cultural participation mode of "Phiffer-Yi Buddha" and "condition Buddha-aid Buddha" after entering China. In the late Ming Dynasty, Catholics based themselves on practice and etiquette to open out "Buddhism" and "change Buddha", but missed the historical opportunity of "the study of sexual reason" and Buddhist thought. Xie Fuya and other modern Christian scholars put forward the theory of the time of Christ study, which is based on the historical experience of deep Chinese Buddhism, and thus has the standpoint of cultural participation from the perspective of historians. A possibility revealed from the historical perspective of epoch is that Christianity and Buddhism have a deep understanding of the ideological basis of understanding in the study of sexual reason. Thanks to the open culture policy of Tang Dynasty, Jingjing adopted the line of deep Chinese culture. Jing Jing as the representative of the Tang Dynasty Jingshi in the study of the "aid Buddha into the scene" made a lot of attempts, leaving valuable historical experience. In the past, scholars often criticized Jingjing for overcatering to local culture, but failed to see the positive significance of Jingjiao surpassing the meaning and realizing the creative melting casting of thought. At that time, Wang Guowei regarded the Dunhuang document as "World Treasure Book" with the keen vision of historians, whose focus was probably to emphasize the cultural strategic significance of the Chinese literature of Jingjiao, which could not be ignored.
【作者单位】：清华大学人文学院哲学系;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“唐元景教综合研究”(15AZD050)
【分类号】：B978;B948

【相似文献】